Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lind Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$142kHuman Services$132kHealth$57kArts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$17kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$791k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN$10,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN CO NEIGHBORHOOD LONGHORNS PROGRAM$10,000
SWAN SONGS$10,000
IMPACT ARTS$6,250
SAFE ALLIANCES$3,000
THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $8k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $8k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $7k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $6k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $5k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $5k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $5k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $4k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $13k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $10k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $10k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $10k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $10k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $8k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $5k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $5k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $5k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $3k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$395k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -100% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$395k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-100%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +149%
  • SS
    Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +81%
  • HA
    HOSPICE AUSTIN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TC
    TOMORROWS CHILD LEGACY PROJECT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
2
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

3
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
4
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
5
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

6
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
7
Saafe House

Saafe house is committed to empowering victims of family violence and sexual assault by providing individualized, immediate, free, and confidential services. our goal is to prevent family violence.

Health
8
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
9
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
10
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
11
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
12
Austin Theatre Alliance

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom Center Texas and the most unlike its peers is Therapy Pet Pals of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes — $75,428 · Human ServicesSwan Songs Musical Last WishesHOSPICE AUSTIN — $56,795 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTINFREEDOM CENTER TEXAS — $20,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM CENTER TEXASTHERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS — $18,534 · Human ServicesTHERAPY PET PALS OF TEXASTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN CO NEIGHBORHOOD LONGHORNS PROGRAM — $64,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTI…Individual grant recipient — $33,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $18,000 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCETHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN — $75,900 · EducationTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AU…MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $16,500 · ReligionIMPACT ARTS INC — $16,050 · Arts & CultureTOMORROWS CHILD LEGACY PROJECT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$170,757Other$115,625Education$75,900Religion$16,500Arts & Culture$16,050Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN — $75,900 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSwan Songs Musical Last Wishes — $75,428 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN — $56,795 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM CENTER TEXAS — $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS — $18,534 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT ARTS INC — $16,050 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTOMORROWS CHILD LEGACY PROJECT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN
  • Who funds Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN
  • Who funds FREEDOM CENTER TEXAS
  • Who funds THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
  • Who funds IMPACT ARTS INC
  • Who funds TOMORROWS CHILD LEGACY PROJECT FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lind Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lind Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lind Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph