Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Florida · Private foundation

The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc

$101
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
100%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$75
Largest grant, FY2022
$75
Organizations funded a year
1 to 9
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
2

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 100% of the organizations The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20222$101100%
FY20211$50100%
FY20209$1k89%
FY20192$203n/a
67% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Human Services$350Arts & Culture$340Philanthropy$320Health$270Religion$158Education$104Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc$27010%
The Ironman Foundation Inc$26010%
Operation New Uniform Inc$25010%
Temple Sinai$1581n/a
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$10410%
All Secure Foundation Inc$5010%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($702), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc

How much does The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc give?
The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc reported 2 grants totaling $101 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 9 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2022, its largest causes are Human Services (19%), Arts & Culture (18%), Philanthropy (17%).
Who are The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2022: The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc ($270), The Ironman Foundation Inc ($260), Operation New Uniform Inc ($250).
Does The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc based?
The Lincoln Rosenthal Foundation Inc is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lincoln Rosenthal’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home