Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Libby & Gary Pedri Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288k
Granted FY2024still arriving
92
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$394kEducation$379kReligion$263kFood & Nutrition$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$4kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k89 grants · $189k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH$68,600
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC SCHOOL$19,960
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,150
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CATHOLIC EXTENSION$5,000
WYATT HUDDEN FAMILY$5,000
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $15k → 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY: $800 → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$758k · 87 repeat orgs$314k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

87 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
142

Total granted

$758k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+8%

Still filing today

3%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH
    7× · 2018–2024 · $199k
  • HS
    HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $56k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2018–2024 · $40k

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography

To promote, advance, and educate its members and the medical community in the science of diagnostic medical sonography.

2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

4
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
5
Extraordinary Home Care Dba St Marys Home Care

A certified home health agency (chha) providing home-based therapy and related rehabilitation services to children and young adults with special needs.

Health
6
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
7
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
8
Iowa Medical Society

Our mission is to advance the practice of medicine through advocacy, education, and engagement with physicians throughout iowa to ensure the highest quality of care for the patients they serve.

9
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

10
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
11
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
12
American Council of Life Insurers

The american council of life insurers, inc. (acli), a non-profit organization incorporated in delaware, provides a unified membership association to advance the common interests of the life insurance industry. the acli is a unified voice…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph's Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 273 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH — $199,079 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCHHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $56,285 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $39,600 · Other+194 more — $705,476 · Other+194 moreHOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY INC — $24,592 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $1,850 · HealthPRIESTS FOR LIFE — $1,072 · Youth Development
Other$1,000,440Human Services$24,592Health$1,850Youth Development$1,072

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY INC — $24,592 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE — $1,072 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF SWEETWATER COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Libby & Gary Pedri Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 273 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph