Skip to content
The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc

The purpose of the association is to promote understanding and dialogue among the member congregations and to collaborate and coordinate activities in working for the common good of the community through action and service.

$657k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$810kHousing & Shelter$375kHealth$238kCommunity Improvement$141kFood & Nutrition$55kCrime & Legal$29kEmployment$25k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $626,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $656,771 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,271 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $252k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY RESCOURCE CENTER$285,000
WHAT IS YOUR VOICE$52,000
SPRINGBOARD COLLECTIVE$50,000
WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS$50,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE$50,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOR BROKEN WINGS$50,000
HARRY K FOUNDATION$30,000
MILTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$25,000
LA ESPERANZA$25,000
THE WAY HOME$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE WAY HOME: $10k → 10%THE WAY HOME: $10k → 10%THE WAY HOME: $10k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE: $50k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE: $40k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE: $35k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $810k · revenue +11% · 43% of their budget
  • WI
    WHAT IS YOUR VOICE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $238k · revenue +91% · 33% of their budget
  • WS
    WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $141k · revenue +0% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • SD
    SPRINGBOARD DELAWARE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • HK
    HARRY K FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • MC
    MILTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Southwest Nj

The organization's mission is to provide households experiencing homelessness or are at risk of homelessness, an opportunity to achieve stability by providing comprehensive shelter diversion/homeless prevention, or transitional housing…

Human Services
2
Family Promise of Cape May County

To provide shelter, meals and case management for homeless families, as well as aiding the families in finding a home , family services and training.

Human Services
3
Homeward Bound Inc

Homeward bound, inc is a private, non-profit agency dedicated to serving families in crisis

—
4
Delaware Center for Homeless Veterans Inc

Provide housing and supportive services for homeless veterans and their family

Public Benefit
5
Williams & Dollard Community Development Corporation

Subsidized/Low to Moderate Income Real Estate Development Social Services

Education
6
Central Delaware Habitat for Humanityinc

Seeking to put god's love into action, cdhfh brings people together to build affordable homes, communities, and hope.

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Promise of Hunterdon County Inc

Provide shelter and care to homeless of Hunterdon County, New Jersey.

Human Services
8
Food Bank of Delaware Inc

The mission of the organization is to inspire hope in our communities by providing food to nourish delawareans, while collaborating on long-term solutions to hunger and poverty.

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Promise of the Jersey Shore Inc

To provide help, hope, and a safe haven for homeless families while they seek permanent employment and affordable housing.

Human Services
10
Delaware County Community Partnership Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for the people of delaware county by encouraging healthy attitudes and behaviors.

Crime & Legal
11
Central Delaware Housing Collaborative Inc

To help low income and homeless woman and families find shelter and secure housing in central delaware.

Housing & Shelter
12
Community Dispute Settlement Program of Delaware County Inc

The organization provides alternative dispute resolution services through delaware and chester counties.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Southern Delaware Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Side New Beginnings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $810,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INCLIGHTHOUSE FOR BROKEN WINGS: $200,000 · Community ImprovementLIGHTHOUSE FOR BROKEN W…WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $140,917 · Community ImprovementWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNING…WHAT IS YOUR VOICE INC: $238,000 · HealthWHAT IS YOUR VOI…FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PRO…THE WAY HOME INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesTHE WAY HO…SPRINGBOARD DELAWARE: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHARRY K FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationMILTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionLA ESPERANZA INC: $25,000 · Employment
Environment$810,000Community Improvement$340,917Health$238,000Human Services$154,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Education$30,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Employment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $810,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetWHAT IS YOUR VOICE INC: $238,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR BROKEN WINGS: $200,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $140,917 over 3y, 34% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN DELAWARE INC: $125,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetSPRINGBOARD DELAWARE: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHARRY K FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE WAY HOME INC: $29,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMILTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLA ESPERANZA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Fo…The Carl M Freeman Fo…Welfare Foundation IncLongwood Foundation I…Wsfs Cares FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
Delaware Community Foundation IncDE23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Family Promise of Southern Delaware Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Way Home Inc: 51% of income from government
  • What Is Your Voice Inc: 27% of income from government
  • La Esperanza Inc: 19% of income from government
  • West Side New Beginnings Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Harry K Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewes-Rehoboth Association of Congregations’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home