Loading…
· Public charity
THE LEONARD & LOIS SCHNITZER CHARITABLE
To conduct or support activities for the benefit of the oregon jewish community foundation.
$92k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
1
Communities
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Youth Development$48kHuman Services$26kInternational$24kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$53k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
—
2022
enrich lives
2023
enrich livessocial
2024
accordance values
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLAND$15,000
- MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$10,400
- THE OREGON HILLEL FOUNDATION$10,000
- B'NAI B'RITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION$10,000
- JEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SERVICES$7,000
- OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC$6,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$157k · 6 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
2
Total granted
$157k
$22k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+80%
+215%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBB'NAI B'RITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +86%
- MJMITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +17%
- TOTHE OREGON HILLEL FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- JFJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLANDgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +215%
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle
The federation leads a strong jewish puget sound by serving as a community voice, (see schedule o) strengthening connections to israel and world jewry, and making investments in jewish life, for today and the next generation.
Philanthropy
2
Jewish Mothers of Metropolitan Seattle
Religion
3
The Jewish Community Center
The jewish community center of greater columbus (jcc) is a nonprofit human service agency offering a varied program that is jewish in nature. it is committed to enhancing the quality of individual and family life through the promotion of…
—
4
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington
We cultivate communities in a warm and inclusive environment to celebrate jewish life and values.
Human Services
5
Jewish Community Alliance
To coordinate, promote, and support the Jewish philanthropic, benevolent, educational, and communal activities in Southern Maine. To foster, develop, and encourage agencies as will best promote the welfare of this community.
Philanthropy
6
Jewish Community Center of Cincinnati
The Mayerson JCC provides cultural, social, educational and recreational programs to the Jewish Community and general community of Greater Cincinnati.
Recreation & Sports
7
Jewish Community Center
The louis s. wolk jewish community center (jcc) aims to be a vibrant center of jewish living and values that is vital to the community at large for generations to come. it's mission has three primary tenants: 1) foster jewish identity, 2)…
Human Services
8
The Contemporary Jewish Museum
Makes the diversity of jewish experience relevant through art & programs that challenge & inspire.
Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Senior Life
To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.
Religion
10
JEWISHColorado
We convene, connect, invest, and protect jewish life in colorado, israel, and around the world.
Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Central California
The organizations primary purpose is to raise funds for distribution to jewish charitable agencies and for sick and destitute people thus part ii, column (d) expenses are included in column (b).
Philanthropy
12
Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc
The milwaukee jewish federation, inc. is a voluntary association of individuals interested in meeting social, health and welfare, educational, recreational, cultural, and other needs of general concern to the jewish community of…
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Child Service and the most unlike its peers is B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$53,400Youth Development$48,000Human Services$25,500International$24,000Philanthropy$15,000Food & Nutrition$13,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds B'NAI B'RITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILD SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Oregon Jewish Community FoundationOR18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE LEONARD & LOIS SCHNITZER CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE OREGON HILLEL FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +65% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 936037440 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE OREGON HILLEL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Leonard & Lois Schnitzer Charitable?
Find your warmest path to The Leonard & Lois Schnitzer Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines