Skip to content
The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.6MScience & Tech$2.3MEducation$1.2MRecreation & Sports$450kEmployment$354kHuman Services$30k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,015,238
Median grant
2
States reached
$727k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE$1,749,107
CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC$1,517,005
LEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUE FOR BLADDER CANCER CARE & RESEARCH$1,015,238
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,015,238
KU ENDOWMENT$1,015,238
ALBERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR WHITE MATTER AND COGNITION$1,010,569
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 50%.

The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 13 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$19M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+66%

Still filing today

62%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +5%
  • UR
    USF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +22%
  • TA
    The Albert Research Institute for White Matter & C
    3× · 2021–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +152% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2017 · $295k
  • UR
    UC REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO HEALTH
    one grant, 2019 · $225k
  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
University of Miami
—
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
9
Nova Southeastern University Inc

The mission of Nova Southeastern University-a selective, doctoral research university-is to deliver academic programs in a dynamic, innovative environment. We foster academic excellence, leadership, integrity (continued on Schedule O) and…

Education
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usf Research Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Albert Research Institute for White Matter & C. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC: $3,493,723 · HealthALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INCThe Albert Research Institute for White Matter & C: $2,056,821 · HealthThe Albert Research Institute for White Matter & CTHE LEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUTE FOR BLADDER CANCER CARE & RESEARCH: $2,019,118 · HealthTHE LEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUTE FOR BLADDER CANCER CARE…CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $1,717,005 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $614,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC+1 more: $25,000 · HealthKU ENDOWMENT: $3,092,544 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTLEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUE FOR BLADDER CANCER CARE & RESEARCH: $477,500 · OtherLEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUE FO…UC REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $397,500 · OtherUC REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALI…DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $354,490 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSU CONN HEALTH CENTER: $333,000 · OtherU CONN HEALTH CENTERCITY OF HOPE: $295,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEUC REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO HEALTH: $224,500 · Other+3 more: $185,000 · OtherUSF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,276,022 · EducationUSF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $450,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du…The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $403,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for…FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY…University of Miami: $200,000 · Education+2 more: $225,000 · EducationCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH INC: $30,000 · Human Services
Health$9,925,667Other$5,359,534Education$4,954,022Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC: $3,493,723 over 7y, 23% of budgetUSF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,276,022 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetThe Albert Research Institute for White Matter & C: $2,056,821 over 3y, 100% of budgetTHE LEO & ANNE ALBERT INSTITUTE FOR BLADDER CANCER CARE & RESEARCH: $2,019,118 over 6y, 99% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $1,717,005 over 3y, 40% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $614,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $403,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE RAFT GROUP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Leo & Anne Albert Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo & Anne Albert’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home