Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$1.1MHealth$65kHuman Services$48kRecreation & Sports$15kCivil Rights$15kArts & Culture$8kEducation$8kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP TWIN LAKES$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
FOCUS$5,000
WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$5,000
EMORY SCHOOL OF NURSING$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$2,500
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND$2,500
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA$2,500
HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $28k → 14%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $3k → 14%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $2k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 18 repeat orgs$844k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$227k
$844k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +156%
  • CT
    CAMP TWIN LAKES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +79%
  • TW
    The William Breman Jewish Home Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $563k
  • SC
    SCHWAB CHARITABLE - FOR THE ANGIE AND SKIP WEILAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $281k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
2
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
3
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
4
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
5
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
6
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
7
Chelsea Jewish Green House Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals and families throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation, and assisted living care without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to…

Health
8
Chelsea Jewish Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in fundraising activities and provide support services to sponsor related non-profit entities which are engaged to enrich the life of each of their residents and program participants, so that each…

Health
9
Jgs Lifecare Corporation

Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.

Health
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
11
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
12
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUND TRUST INC (DAF): $562,500 · OtherTHE MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUND TRUST INC (DAF)SCHWAB CHARITABLE - FOR THE ANGIE AND SKIP WEILAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $281,250 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE - FOR THE ANGIE AND SKIP WEILAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND+10 more: $122,400 · Other+10 moreGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $281,250 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNIT…+1 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesThe Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc: $15,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 · Civil RightsROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$966,150Philanthropy$288,750Human Services$37,000Health$22,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Civil Rights$15,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $281,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA GROUP HOME INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds The William Breman Jewish Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA GROUP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lenore and Victor Maslia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph