How much did THE LENORE AND VICTOR MASLIA FOUNDATION grant in FY2019?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of THE LENORE AND VICTOR MASLIA FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$232k

Total assets

Largest grants

OR VESHALOM$5,000
WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME$5,000
EMORY SCHOOL OF NURSING$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
CHABAD OF COBB$5,000
CAMP TWIN LAKES$5,000
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$5,000
FOCUS$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$2,500
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND$2,500
HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA$2,500
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$227k · 18 repeat orgs$844k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$227k

$844k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%

-4%

Still filing today

44%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JF
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES
3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +76%
CT
CAMP TWIN LAKES
3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +96%
WB
WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME
3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

TM
THE MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUND TRUST INC
one grant, 2018 · $281k
SC
SCHWAB CHARITABLE - FOR THE ANGIE AND SKIP WEILAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND
one grant, 2018 · $281k
GH
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $281k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

To manage a continuum of senior care business lines.

Health

Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas

The jewish federation of greater dallas coordinates and implements fundraising, social planning, leadership development and community relations for the jewish community.

Philanthropy

The Jewish Home Foundation Inc

See schedule o for complete mission description.to carry out activities exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes for the benefit of the charitable entity, jewish home life communities, inc. and related entities.

Philanthropy

Jewish Home Life Communities Inc

See schedule o for complete mission statement.to support the journey of aging through health and daily living solutions, guided by jewish values.

Housing & Shelter

Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health

Jgs Lifecare Corporation

Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.

Health

Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

To provide the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation services.

Health

Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

To provide home health and hospice care services regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Jewish Association for Community

The jewish association for community living (jcl) assists people with developmental disabilities to participate in community life through personal empowerment, community engagement, family relationships, and quality services enhanced by…

—

Chelsea Jewish Charitable

The organization provides fundraising and support services to related organizations within chelsea jewish lifecare, inc. group.

Health

Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy

Jewish Community Foundation of

Philanthropic asset management and grantmaking to both jewish and secular charitable organizations.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Career Services and the most unlike its peers is Greater Houston Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

6/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$692,400Philanthropy$288,750Human Services$32,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Civil Rights$15,000Health$15,000Youth Development$7,500Housing & Shelter$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE LENORE AND VICTOR MASLIA FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ATLANTA GROUP HOME.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 581360527 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ATLANTA GROUP HOME, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE LENORE AND VICTOR MASLIA FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE LENORE AND VICTOR MASLIA FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation?

More from the funding graph