· Private foundation
The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $5,000 |
| EMORY SCHOOL OF NURSING | $5,000 |
| CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $5,000 |
| FOCUS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CAMP TWIN LAKES | $5,000 |
| WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HIGH MUSEUM OF ART | $2,500 |
| CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $2,500 |
| JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES | $2,500 |
| SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA | $2,500 |
| JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +156%
- CTCAMP TWIN LAKES INC3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +79%
- TWThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TMTHE MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUND TRUST INCone grant, 2018 · $563k
- SCSCHWAB CHARITABLE - FOR THE ANGIE AND SKIP WEILAND PHILANTHROPIC FUNDone grant, 2018 · $281k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…
The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…
To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.
To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.
The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.
Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.
The organization's mission is to provide individuals and families throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation, and assisted living care without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to…
The organization's mission is to engage in fundraising activities and provide support services to sponsor related non-profit entities which are engaged to enrich the life of each of their residents and program participants, so that each…
Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.
Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds The William Breman Jewish Home Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA GROUP HOME INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lenore and Victor Maslia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.