Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leighty Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2017
8
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0144% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$10kHealth$3kInternational$3kScience & Tech$1kOther$0
02FY2017 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $17,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $212,175 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $195,175 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Environmental Law and Policy Center$5,000
Apostles Chief To Serve Healthcare$3,000
Doctors Without Borders USA$3,000
Renewable Energy Alaska Project$2,000
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council$1,000
Natural Resources Defense Council$1,000
Union of Concerned Scientists$1,000
World Wildlife Fund$1,000
02Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWESTRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT: $2,000 · EnvironmentRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECTSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC: $1,000 · EnvironmentSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACCNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCI…Apostles Chief To Serve Healthcare: $3,000 · OtherApostles Chief To Se…
Environment$10,000International$4,000Other$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

03Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leighty Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Leighty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $159k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leighty’s filings →

More from the funding graph