Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leighton-Oare Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MHuman Services$718kPhilanthropy$516kHealth$332kEducation$249kFood & Nutrition$119kHousing & Shelter$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $326k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $410k
  • $250k+1 grant · $600k
$7,100
Median grant
13
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION$600,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY-NILES$80,000
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$75,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$55,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS VA$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSCOCIATION INC$40,000
SANTA FE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL CLUB$33,500
ACADEMY AT THE LAKES$26,000
VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC$20,000
EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC (UNC)$20,000
UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION$11,725
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $6k → 6%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $5k → 6%PROJECT HORIZON: $500 → 12%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $4k → 6%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $4k → 6%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $4k → 6%REAL SERVICES: $7k → 13%REAL SERVICES: $7k → 13%REAL SERVICES: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 84 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
34

Total granted

$4.4M
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

52%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +77%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +115%
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $134k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MICHIANA
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SB
    SOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -15%
  • CE
    CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $46k · revenue +126% · 68% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
8
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
11
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is J Red Peach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
52/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO FOUNDATION: $375,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY-NILES: $250,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY-NILESIndividual grant recipient: $210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSCOCIATION INC: $179,500 · OtherCAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSCOCIATION INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MICHIANA: $100,000 · Other+77 more: $1,337,370 · Other+77 moreVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 · EnvironmentVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDA…+2 more: $21,000 · EnvironmentUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $907,500 · EducationUniversity of Notre D…ACADEMY AT THE LAKES INC: $59,400 · EducationACADEMY AT THE LAKES …CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $46,000 · Education+7 more: $48,300 · EducationWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $210,000 · HealthNorton Healthcare Inc: $50,000 · HealthMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $40,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $15,000 · Health+8 more: $30,000 · HealthVIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION: $134,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC: $55,375 · Recreation & SportsUPPERVILLE COLT & HORSE SHOW INC: $35,200 · Recreation & SportsWashington International Horse Show: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports+5 more: $14,500 · Recreation & SportsMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJ RED PEACH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyBLOWING ROCK CHARITY HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION INC: $24,100 · PhilanthropyBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN RIVER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $3,500 · PhilanthropySOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $75,000 · Arts & CultureThe People's Music School: $35,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,451,870Environment$1,321,000Education$1,061,200Health$345,000Recreation & Sports$269,075Philanthropy$142,600Arts & Culture$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $907,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $210,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION: $134,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $75,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetChild Advocacy Center Inc: $62,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetACADEMY AT THE LAKES INC: $59,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC: $55,375 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNorton Healthcare Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $46,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MICHIANA INC: $42,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJ RED PEACH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 52% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUPPERVILLE COLT & HORSE SHOW INC: $35,200 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe People's Music School: $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWashington International Horse Show: $30,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLOWING ROCK CHARITY HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION INC: $24,100 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHIGHLAND SCHOOL INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFERNWOOD INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $16,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARRENTON VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTOKEN III CLUB: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIAN PARKER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetALCOHOL & ADDICTIONS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWARRENTON HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetGREEN RIVER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIANA ECHO SOCCER CLUB INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEquestrian Aid Foundation: $3,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA NAT'L HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENUES PARKS & ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY AT THE LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Norton Healthcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP EBERHART ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MICHIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds J RED PEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPERVILLE COLT & HORSE SHOW INC ↗
  • Who funds The People's Music School ↗
  • Who funds Washington International Horse Show ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Wise FoundationVA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wise Foundation · Dun Foundation · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · American Electric Power Foundation · The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc · The Charles Cohn Foundation Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Everwise Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leighton-Oare Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leighton-Oare Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Child Advocacy Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leighton-Oare Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Leighton-Oare Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leighton-Oare’s filings →

More from the funding graph