Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lee Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$180kCommunity Improvement$37kEnvironment$34kPhilanthropy$25kScience & Tech$20kHealth$13kAnimals$9kEducation$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baltimore Symphony Orchestra$16,000
Shriver Hall Concert Series$11,000
31 501C(3) Organizations for 800 or less$5,850
WETA$2,800
The Nature Conservancy$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
University of Iowa$1,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
World Wildlife Fund$1,000
WBJC FM$1,000
Best Friends Animal Society$1,000
Mercy Ridge Scholarship Fund$1,000
Baltimore Museum of Art$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 15 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$299k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+23%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $96k · revenue +49%
  • SH
    SHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +57%
  • BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • JH
    Johns Hopkins Univ YCL Lab
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • 35
    30 501C(3) Organizations for 900 or less
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • UO
    Univ of Iowa Cntr for Advncmt
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
6
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
7
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
8
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $96,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCSHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INC: $68,000 · Arts & CultureSHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INCBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,600 · Arts & Culture31 501C(3) Organizations for 800 or less: $38,150 · Other31 501C(3) Organizations for 800 or less51 Nonprofit Organizations for 500 or less: $36,600 · Other51 Nonprofit Organizations for 500 or lessJohns Hopkins Univ YCL Lab: $20,000 · OtherJohns Hopkins Univ YCL Lab30 501C(3) Organizations for 900 or less: $18,100 · Other30 501C(3) Organizations for 900 or lessTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,400 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYJohns Hopkins Univ & Med Cntr: $9,000 · OtherJohns Hopkins Univ & Med CntrUniversity of Iowa: $7,000 · Other+10 more: $14,750 · Other+10 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $750 · EnvironmentMARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,100 · Human ServicesMercy Ridge Inc: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $800 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$173,600Other$161,000Environment$16,750Animals$9,000International$6,000Human Services$1,100Housing & Shelter$1,000Philanthropy$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $96,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INC: $68,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ridge Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRIVER HALL CONCERT SERIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ridge Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lee Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lee Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Shriver Hall Concert Series Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art: 4% of income from government
  • Maryland Zoological Society Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lee Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph