Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Layman Foundation

Promote/support christian education with work study/agricultural emphasis.

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$1.5MArts & Culture$125k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $277k
$26,984
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLETCHER ACADEMY$151,587
HERITAGE ACADEMY$125,397
RURAL LIFE FOUNDATION DBA HARBERT$49,206
WEIMAR ACADEMY$46,825
OKLAHOMA ACADEMY$29,365
OUACHITA HILLS ACADEMY$26,984
LAURELBROOK SANITARIUM & SCHOOL$21,429
CASTLE VALLEY ACADEMY$17,460
JEFFERSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$16,667
BEACON ACADEMY$9,524
HARTLAND DAY ACADEMY$5,556
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WEIMAR ACADEMY: $47k → 6%JEFFERSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $17k → 18%OKLAHOMA ACADEMY: $29k → 16%OUACHITA HILLS ACADEMY: $27k → 20%BEACON ACADEMY: $10k → 12%LAURELBROOK SANITARIUM & SCHOOL: $27k → 14%HERITAGE ACADEMY: $125k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $318k → 12%CASTLE VALLEY ACADEMY: $17k → 11%HARTLAND DAY ACADEMY: $6k → 8%WEIMAR ACADEMY: $36k → 6%JEFFERSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $13k → 18%OKLAHOMA ACADEMY: $20k → 16%OUACHITA HILLS ACADEMY: $20k → 20%BEACON ACADEMY: $6k → 12%LAURELBROOK SANITARIUM & SCHOOL: $21k → 14%RURAL LIFE FOUNDATION DBA HARBERT: $49k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $300k → 12%CASTLE VALLEY ACADEMY: $11k → 11%WEIMAR ACADEMY: $19k → 6%JEFFERSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $7k → 18%OKLAHOMA ACADEMY: $10k → 16%OUACHITA HILLS ACADEMY: $8k → 20%LAURELBROOK SANITARIUM & SCHOOL: $12k → 14%RURAL LIFE FOUNDATION DBA HARBERT: $36k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $152k → 12%LAURELBROOK SANITARIUM AND SCHOOL: $9k → 14%HERITAGE ACADEMY: $26k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $103k → 12%HERITAGE ACADEMY: $20k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $57k → 12%RURAL LIFE FOUNDATION DBA HARBERT: $17k → 24%FLETCHER ACADEMY: $51k → 12%RURAL LIFE FOUNDATION DBA HARBERT: $15k → 24%HERITAGE ACADEMY: $14k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

CA
UT
VA
AR
TN
NC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FLETCHER ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $981k · revenue +42%
  • LS
    Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +38%
  • MU
    Missions Unlimited of Oregon Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +449%

Funded once

  • HI
    HARTLAND INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND EDUCATION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westmoreland Christian Academy

Westmoreland Christian Academy educates children Pre-K thru 12th Grade using the accepted ABEKA Curriculum. WCA maintains a regular faculty with a regular enrolled body of pupils or students in attendance where it conducts the educational…

Education
2
Cedar Ridge Academy Inc

Boarding School for students from grades 7 through 12.

3
Living Education Academy

Operate a cottage school following the gospel

Education
4
Liberty Christian Academy Inc

To provide quality education from pre-k through high school

Education
5
Bluegrass Christian Academy Inc

Bluegrass christian academy partners with families to educate students in the classical tradition and form then into god-honoring people who grow in wisdom, virtue and service to others through the entirety of their lives.

Education
6
Horizon Christian Academy Inc

private school

Education
7
Heritage Christian Academy Inc

School grades preK - 12th grade

Education
8
Brethren Frontier School

Quality Christian education

9
The Christian Education Society of Mebane Inc

Bradford Academy is Classical and Christ-centered in order to glorify God by educating children to love God with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength and to love their neighbor as themselves.

Education
10
Hill County Christian Academy

Educating students in Hill and surrounding counties in grades one through twelve.

Education
11
Hollandale Christian School

Education from a christian perspective, teaching 70-80 students k-8th grade.

Education
12
Liberty Christian School Inc

Private Christian school for grades 3rd-12th which offers academics and extra-curricular activities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Castle Valley Academy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ouachita Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLETCHER ACADEMY INC — $980,585 · OtherFLETCHER ACADEMY INCHERITAGE ACADEMY INC — $184,575 · OtherHERITAGE ACADEMY INCRural Life Foundation Inc — $116,919 · OtherRural Life Foundation IncOUACHITA MINISTRIES INC — $101,896 · OtherOUACHITA MINISTRIES INCLaurelbrook Sanitarium and School Inc — $68,912 · OtherWeimar Institute — $55,407 · Other+1 more — $28,255 · OtherMissions Unlimited of Oregon Inc — $59,520 · InternationalJefferson Christian Academy — $36,317 · EducationBEACON ACADEMY — $15,205 · EducationHARTLAND INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND EDUCATION — $5,556 · Education
Other$1,536,549International$59,520Education$57,078

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLETCHER ACADEMY INC — $980,585 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetRural Life Foundation Inc — $116,919 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOUACHITA MINISTRIES INC — $101,896 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetLaurelbrook Sanitarium and School Inc — $68,912 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMissions Unlimited of Oregon Inc — $59,520 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetWeimar Institute — $55,407 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJefferson Christian Academy — $36,317 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCASTLE VALLEY ACADEMY INC — $28,255 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBEACON ACADEMY — $15,205 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHARTLAND INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND EDUCATION — $5,556 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asi Missions IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asi Missions Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Layman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Layman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Layman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph