· Private foundation
The Laverack Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| GRACE COTTAGE FAMILY HEALTH & HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| BANNER LAKE CLUB | $60,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $36,568 |
| ST PAULS SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| BITTERROOT EARLY LEARNING NETWORK | $20,000 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE FUND | $12,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC | $10,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $10,000 |
| CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL | $10,000 |
| HOUSE OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| THE WILD CENTER | $10,000 |
| JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +74%
DUKE UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $302k · revenue +49%- TBTHE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC6× · 2020–2025 · $206k · revenue +43%
Funded once
THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +42%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $43k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTYone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Rippowam Cisqua School creates independent thinkers, confident communicators, and engaged leaders who respect and contribute meaningfully to a diverse and increasingly complex global society.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…
Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Canaan Country School Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Khaliq Melle Sanda Foundation Incc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds The Pine School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TEACHING MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST RIVER MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BITTERROOT EARLY LEARNING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EKWANOK SCHOLARSHIP TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds DARIEN NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BROMLEY OUTING CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds MATHER HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Landmark Charitable Foundation Inc · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Legatus Foundation · George L Ohrstrom Foundation · Colket Family Foundation · Horizon Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Laverack Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- West River Montessori School — 41% of income from government
- Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc — 16% of income from government
- Mather Homestead Foundation — 4% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Darien Nature Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Pine School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.