Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Laurie David Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Environment$227kFood & Nutrition$75kCrime & Legal$50kPhilanthropy$10kInternational$5kRecreation & Sports$4k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$20,000
BIODIVERSITY WORKS$5,000
THE FIELD FUND$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOODWELL CLIMATE RESEARCH CENTER: $50k → 8%ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE: $25k → 8%NRDC: $60k → 14%NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $8k → 17%EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50k → 18%ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE: $25k → 8%NRDC: $49k → 14%ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE: $25k → 8%MARTHAS VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $20k → 8%VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $15k → 8%VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 8%BIODIVERSITY WORKS: $5k → 8%BIODIVERSITY WORKS: $5k → 8%BIODIVERSITY WORKS: $5k → 8%THE FIELD FUND: $3k → 8%THE FIELD FUND: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 5 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$248k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+38%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentFood & NutritionScience & TechCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +437%
  • VC
    VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $45k · revenue +17%
  • BI
    BIODIVERSITYWORKS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -48%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +77%
  • NY
    NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hudson Carbon Research Foundation in

Hudson carbon is dedicated to catalyzing the adoption of regenerative organic agriculture by advancing our scientific understanding of its practices and systems, and their potential to radically reverse climate change and environmental…

Environment
2
Applied Ecological Institute Inc

Aei is a non profit ideation collaborative studio creating globalscale, ecological based solutions for a climate positive future.

Environment
3
Martha's Vineyard Shellfish Group Inc

The martha's vineyard shellfish group, a non-profit consortium of the shellfish departments of six island towns, provides shellfish propagation services to increase the availability of juvenile commercially valuable molluscan shellfish…

Animals
4
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
5
Biodiversity Research Institute

To provide progressive environmental study and education that furthers global sustainablity and conservation policies.

Environment
6
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
7
Earth Island Institute Inc

Earth Island Institute (the Organization) was founded in 1982 by legendary environmentalist David R. Brower (1912-2000) to confront the unprecedented threats to life on Earth. The Organization supports environmental initiatives that are…

Environment
8
Island Housing Trust Corporation

To own and lease land for the purpose of developing, building and maintaining affordable housing on martha's vineyard, massachusetts.

Housing & Shelter
9
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
10
Earth Matter Ny Inc

The organization is based on governor's island whose mission is to reduce the organic waste misdirected into new york city's landfills by encouraging neighbor participation and leadership in composting.

Environment
11
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
12
Martha's Vineyard Agricultural Society Inc

The martha's vineyard agricultural society supports a resilient and sustainable agricultural community on martha's vineyard. we do this by:- offering services, education, marketing, and technical support for farmers and farmworkers on the…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vineyard Conservation Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dir Biyabir. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NRDC: $109,100 · OtherNRDCDIR BIYABIR: $5,000 · OtherISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $75,000 · Food & NutritionISLAND GROWN INITIATIV…VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentVINEYARD CONSERVATIO…BIODIVERSITYWORKS INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentBIODIVERSITYWORKS IN…NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $7,500 · EnvironmentNEW YORK RESTORATION…Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $50,000 · Science & TechWoodwell Climat…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE I…MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FIELD FUND INC: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$114,100Food & Nutrition$75,000Environment$67,500Science & Tech$50,000Civil Rights$50,000Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $75,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBIODIVERSITYWORKS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIELD FUND INC: $3,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tower Family Fund IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tower Family Fund Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Laurie David Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Laurie David Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Biodiversityworks Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Laurie David Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Laurie David Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laurie David’s filings →

More from the funding graph