Skip to content
The Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley Inc

As caretakers, the last green valley connects people with the abundant and diverse natural, historical and cultural resources within eastern connecticut and south-central massachusetts.

$57k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Environment$136kAnimals$47kPublic Benefit$23kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$10kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$11,341
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$14,900
EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT$14,289
NORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICT$11,341
OPACUM LAND TRUST$9,467
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLAND$6,800
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$161k · 5 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$161k
$80k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $63k
  • NA
    NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k
  • OL
    OPACUM LAND TRUST
    2× · 2021–2022 · $28k

Funded once

  • EC
    EASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DI
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
  • WC
    WINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • WR
    WINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2022.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2022, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $62,653 · OtherEASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICTNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $30,900 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYOPACUM LAND TRUST: $28,257 · OtherOPACUM LAND TRUSTNORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $23,229 · OtherNORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICTEASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DI: $21,500 · OtherEASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DIAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLAND: $15,800 · OtherAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLANDWINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherWINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherTOWN OF UNION: $9,747 · Other+3 more: $19,000 · Other+3 more
Other$241,086

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home