Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley Inc

As caretakers, the last green valley connects people with the abundant and diverse natural, historical and cultural resources within eastern connecticut and south-central massachusetts.

$57k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$11,341
Median grant
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$14,900
EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT$14,289
NORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICT$11,341
OPACUM LAND TRUST$9,467
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLAND$6,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$161k · 5 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$161k
$80k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $63k
  • NA
    NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k
  • OL
    OPACUM LAND TRUST
    2× · 2021–2022 · $28k

Funded once

  • EC
    EASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DI
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
  • WC
    WINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • WR
    WINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2022.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20192022, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICT — $62,653 · OtherEASTERN CT CONSERVATION DISTRICTNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY — $30,900 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYOPACUM LAND TRUST — $28,257 · OtherOPACUM LAND TRUSTNORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICT — $23,229 · OtherNORTHERN RI CONSERVATION DISTRICTEASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DI — $21,500 · OtherEASTERN CONNECTICUT CONSERVATION DIAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLAND — $15,800 · OtherAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLANDWINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherWINDHAM REGIONAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherTOWN OF UNION — $9,747 · Other+3 more — $19,000 · Other+3 more
Other$241,086

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph