Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kramer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$260kReligion$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$643k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$40,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$38,750
ST ANDRE BESSETTE CSA$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$17,800
MERCY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 24%THE MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 24%THE MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 3 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$231k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+15%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mississippi State University Foundation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $120k · revenue +82%
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $78k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL AND ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - HIGH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • CA
    CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF THE HOLY FAMI
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $77,500 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL AND ACADEMY: $33,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL AND ACADEMYWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - HIGH PROGRAM: $25,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - HIGH PROGRAMST ANDRE BESSETTE CSA: $20,000 · OtherST ANDRE BESSETTE CSAARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT: $15,200 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT+3 more: $3,000 · OtherMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesMississippi State University Foundation IncCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF THE HOLY FAMI: $2,000 · Education
Other$174,500Human Services$120,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $120,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF THE HOLY FAMI: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF THE HOLY FAMI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kramer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kramer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kramer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph