Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kirkpatrick Family Foundation Co Kathleen M Pierce - Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Kirkpatrick Family Foundation Co Kathleen M Pierce - Trustee’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Seattle Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Kirkpatrick Family Foundation Co Kathleen M Pierce - Trustee named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $154k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

21
17
21
18
19
19
18
20
16
21
13
22
14
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$1.4MEducation$121kCrime & Legal$98kHuman Services$84kPublic Benefit$56kCommunity Improvement$55kSocial Science$54kCivil Rights$34kArts & Culture$31kOther$158k
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$25,000
VENTURES$10,000
501 COMMONS$10,000
COMMON POWER FUTURE$10,000
FREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUDGET SO$9,000
PUDGET SOUND SAGE$8,000
ONE AMERICA$8,000
WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET POLICY CENT$8,000
REAL CHANGE$7,500
HOPEWELL FUND$7,500
CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,000
COMMUNITIES RISE$7,000
PARTNERS ASIA$7,000
NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REAL CHANGE: $5k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $5k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $8k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $8k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $8k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $6k → 9%REAL CHANGE: $6k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$680k · 30 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$680k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+106%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesCivil RightsPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VENTURES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +65%
  • 5C
    501 Commons
    7× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +566%
  • PS
    PUGET SOUND SAGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CP
    COMMON POWER FUTUREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +106%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
2
Washington Community Alliance

Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement

Civil Rights
3
Economic Opportunity Institute

Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.

Community Improvement
4
Washington Progress Fund

Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…

Philanthropy
5
Washington Progress Alliance

Washington Progress Alliance is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington State supported by a network of committed donors.

Community Improvement
6
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

7
Pathwaves Washington

Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.

Education
8
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
11
JustLead Washington

JustLead Washington is growing a sustainable network of community leaders who can effectively and collaboratively work toward equity and justice with low-income and marginalized individuals and communities throughout WA

Community Improvement
12
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School's Out Washington and the most unlike its peers is Womens Funding Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Grantmaking Found…Immigrant & Refugee ServicesYouth Baseball & Softball P…Food Banks & Food AccessIndependent Early Childhood…Youth Education & Opportuni…Supportive Housing & Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr19%44%20–35yr12%12%35–55yr12%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr12%2%35–55yr12%70%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/28
the rest of the field
14%
1,718/12,711

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,330,425 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION+1 more — $32,500 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON STATE BUDGET POLICY CENT — $39,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STAT…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES — $33,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUN…Individual grant recipient — $22,125 · OtherIndividual gran…Womens Funding Alliance — $12,000 · OtherPUGET SOUND SAGE — $54,000 · OtherPUGET SOUND SAG…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $14,000 · OtherSankofa Impact — $10,000 · OtherCOMMON POWER FUTURE — $10,000 · OtherPartners Asia — $31,000 · OtherPartners AsiaGot Green — $25,000 · OtherGot Green+7 more — $26,400 · Other+7 moreVENTURES — $59,000 · EducationNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS — $42,000 · EducationCHATTANOOGA GIRLS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $14,000 · EducationCASA LATINA — $6,000 · EducationFREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUGET SOUND — $47,000 · Crime & LegalCommunities Rise — $31,000 · Crime & LegalPURPOSE DIGNITY ACTION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalREAL CHANGE HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT — $44,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $29,500 · Human ServicesBrightspark Early Learning Services — $10,000 · Human ServicesONEAMERICA — $46,000 · Public BenefitTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER — $10,000 · Public Benefit501 Commons — $54,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$1,362,925Other$276,525Education$121,000Crime & Legal$98,000Human Services$84,000Public Benefit$56,000Community Improvement$54,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,330,425 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetVENTURES — $59,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budget501 Commons — $54,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPUGET SOUND SAGE — $54,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUGET SOUND — $47,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetONEAMERICA — $46,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetREAL CHANGE HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT — $44,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS — $42,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities Rise — $31,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPartners Asia — $31,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $29,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGot Green — $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTANOOGA GIRLS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Funding Alliance — $12,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSankofa Impact — $10,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBrightspark Early Learning Services — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPURPOSE DIGNITY ACTION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON POWER FUTURE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASA LATINA — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTILTH ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST — $4,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMunicipal League Foundation — $3,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VENTURES
  • Who funds 501 Commons
  • Who funds PUGET SOUND SAGE
  • Who funds FREEDOM EDUCATION PROJECT PUGET SOUND
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA
  • Who funds REAL CHANGE HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT
  • Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND
  • Who funds Communities Rise
  • Who funds Partners Asia
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Got Green
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA GIRLS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
  • Who funds Womens Funding Alliance
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER
  • Who funds Sankofa Impact
  • Who funds Brightspark Early Learning Services
  • Who funds PURPOSE DIGNITY ACTION
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds COMMON POWER FUTURE
  • Who funds CASA LATINA
  • Who funds TILTH ALLIANCE
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST
  • Who funds Municipal League Foundation
  • Who funds SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA39.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · United Way of King County · Inatai Foundation · Ridge Road Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Russell Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kirkpatrick Family Foundation Co Kathleen M Pierce - Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph