Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kim Yong Hwan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$958kCivil Rights$155kHuman Services$71kCommunity Improvement$40kArts & Culture$27kHealth$21kEducation$13kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORANGE KOREAN CHURCH$70,000
KOREAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF LA$20,000
WON FOUNDATION$10,000
CORNER STONE CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SARANG CHURCH$10,000
EXCHANGE COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
CERRITOS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 10%KOREAN CENTER: $1k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
0%

Still filing today

27%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHALOM CHURCH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $411k
  • KA
    KOREAN AMERICAN COALITION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $155k · revenue +147%
  • OK
    ORANGE KOREAN CHURCH
    3× · 2019–2025 · $130k

Funded once

  • TO
    THE ORIENTAL MISSION CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $47k
  • K
    KACC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • GG
    GARDEN GROVE POLICE STATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
2
Korean Senior Citizens Association of San Fernando Valley
Recreation & Sports
3
Korean Christian Broadcasting System

None

Arts & Culture
4
Korean American Network International

To spread the gospel to the underserved countries

International
5
The Korean Church of Ann Arbor

To fullfil our mission we embrace the following purpose to bring believers to spritual maturity through Fellowship with other Christian, Learing and living Christs teachings, Outreach to all people, Worshipping Him alone and doing and…

Religion
6
Korean Central Presbyterian Church of Houston

The church was established to have christian worship, fellowship, bible education, missionary and services.

—
7
The United Korean Association of Hawaii

Korean community services

Human Services
8
Korean Christian Mission Usa

Established website to provide sermons, seminars, and special events for christian communities

Religion
9
Seoul Presbyterian Church

Church

—
10
Joyful Korean Community Church

The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey his commands now…

Religion
11
Korean Hanbit Presbyterian Church

To operate a church to worship god, to preach the gospel of jesus

Religion
12
The Korean Library Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Korean Gospel Broadcasting Co Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHALOM CHURCH: $411,000 · OtherSHALOM CHURCHORANGE KOREAN CHURCH: $130,000 · OtherORANGE KOREAN CHURCHCORNER STONE CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherCORNER STONE CHURCHTHE ORIENTAL MISSION CHURCH: $47,000 · OtherKCBN: $40,000 · OtherEXCHANGE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherKOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUND: $35,000 · Other+28 more: $277,900 · Other+28 moreKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION: $155,000 · Civil RightsKOREAN AMERIC…HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $60,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHANA CHURCH: $40,000 · ReligionKOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC: $10,000 · ReligionKCBMCUSA: $3,000 · ReligionYONG SAN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SC: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · HealthGARDEN CULTURAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,035,900Civil Rights$155,000Human Services$61,000Religion$53,000Education$10,000Health$3,500Public Benefit$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION: $155,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetHANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $60,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetHANA CHURCH: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYONG SAN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SC: $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetKOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlways Dream Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetGARDEN CULTURAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetKOREAN CENTER INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ORIENTAL MISSION CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds HANA CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds YONG SAN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SC ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KCBMCUSA ↗
  • Who funds Always Dream Inc ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CULTURAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kim Yong Hwan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kim Yong Hwan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kim Yong Hwan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kim Yong Hwan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kim Yong Hwan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph