Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$181kHealth$112kRecreation & Sports$30kReligion$14kInternational$4kHuman Services$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$510k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brigham & Women's Hospital$10,000
Roger Williams University$8,000
Heather Bone Foundation$2,500
Pancreatic Cancer Action$1,500
Dana Farber$1,000
Holy Famiy Church$1,000
Boston College$1,000
St Anselm's College$1,000
Duxbury High School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Matt Brown Foundation: $5k → 7%Holy Family Church: $5k → 8%UMass Lowell Lacross: $2k → 8%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%Pancreatic Cancer Action: $2k → 14%Roger Williams Men's Lacrosse: $15k → 7%Providence College Athletics: $11k → 14%Project Walk: $1k → 5%St Anselms College: $25k → 7%Matt Brown Foundation: $5k → 7%Heather Bone Foundation: $3k → 8%University of Massachusetts Lowell: $2k → 8%Stonehill College: $23k → 11%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%Pancreatic Cancer Action: $1k → 14%Roger Williams University: $5k → 7%Providence College: $5k → 14%St Anselm's College: $25k → 7%Matt Brown Foundation: $3k → 7%Holy Family Church: $3k → 8%UMass Lowell Lacrosse: $1k → 8%Stonehill College: $20k → 11%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%St Anselms College: $11k → 7%Matt Brown Foundation: $3k → 7%Holy Family Church: $2k → 8%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%St Anselms College: $5k → 7%Boston College: $2k → 7%Holy Family Church: $2k → 8%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%St Anselm College: $3k → 7%Boston College: $2k → 7%Chandler School PTA: $1k → 8%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $10k → 16%St Anselm's College: $1k → 7%Boston College: $2k → 7%Holy Family Church: $1k → 8%Brigham & Women's Hospital: $5k → 16%Boston College: $1k → 7%Holy Famiy Church: $1k → 8%Emmanuel Fund: $1k → 16%Xaverian Brother High School: $5k → 7%Por Cristo Inc: $3k → 16%Xaverian Brothers: $4k → 7%Xaverian Bros High School: $4k → 7%Xaverian Bros High School: $3k → 7%BWH Benjamin Banks Fellowship: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 14 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$298k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STONEHILL COLLEGE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $43k · revenue +26%
  • ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +6%
  • PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $16k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • RW
    Roger Williams Men's Lacrosse
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • XB
    XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • XB
    Xaverian Brothers
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
6
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stonehill College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Matt Brown Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Anselm's College: $67,000 · OtherSt Anselm's CollegeMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $65,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDPeter Banks Endowment Fund: $20,000 · OtherPeter Banks Endowment FundRoger Williams Men's Lacrosse: $15,000 · OtherRoger Williams Men's LacrosseHoly Family Church: $11,500 · OtherHoly Family Church+19 more: $34,950 · Other+19 moreSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC: $43,000 · EducationSTONEHILL COLLEGE INCROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY: $33,000 · EducationROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITYPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $16,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGETRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE+1 more: $3,000 · EducationMATT BROWN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 · Health+2 more: $350 · HealthPOR CRISTO INC: $3,500 · InternationalDuxbury Gridiron Club Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $300 · Philanthropy
Other$213,450Education$106,000Health$17,850International$3,500Recreation & Sports$1,000Philanthropy$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY: $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATT BROWN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOR CRISTO INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDuxbury Gridiron Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDuxbury Boosters Club Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STONEHILL COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MATT BROWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POR CRISTO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds Duxbury Gridiron Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds Duxbury Boosters Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kevin and Kathleen Gould Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph