Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MEducation$63kHealth$720
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CHABAD OF THE SHORE$15,000
THE ENGLEWOOD STIEBEL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,400
BRIS AVRAHAM$4,200
CHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM$4,000
ENGLEWOOD TORAH CENTER$3,600
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
CHABAD OF ENGLEWOOD$1,800
KEHILAT KESHER$1,645
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%YESHIVAT CHATTAN SOFER: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL: $23k → 28%JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 14%CHABAD OF RANDOLPH: $2k → 4%CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $5k → 6%CHABAD RUTGERS: $185k → 8%JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $38k → 10%YESHEVET BEN YITZHAK: $120k → 12%MARYLAND HILLEL: $2k → 11%YESHIVA MESIVTA: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL: $11k → 28%JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 14%EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE: $27k → 7%CHABAD RUTGERS: $88k → 8%JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $36k → 10%YESHEVET BE'ER YITZHAK: $85k → 12%CONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL: $8k → 28%MONMOUTH TORAH LINKS: $10k → 6%MORIAH SCHOOL: $18k → 7%CHABAD RUTGERS: $11k → 8%JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $15k → 10%YESHEVET BEN YITZHAK: $60k → 12%CHABAD OF THE SHORE: $23k → 6%EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE: $17k → 7%BRIS AVROHAM: $66k → 10%CHABAD OF THE SHORE: $15k → 6%CHABAD OF ENGLEWOOD: $11k → 7%BRIS AVROHAM: $40k → 10%BROTHERS OF ISRAEL: $15k → 6%THE ENGLEWOOD STIEBEL: $10k → 7%BRIS AVROHAM: $39k → 10%CHABAD OF THE SHORE: $11k → 6%MORIAH SCHOOL: $9k → 7%CONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH: $38k → 10%BROTHERS OF ISRAEL: $10k → 6%EAST HILL SYNOGOGUE: $8k → 7%CONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH: $20k → 10%BROTHERS OF ISRAEL: $8k → 6%ENGLEWOOD TORAH CENTER: $8k → 7%YESHIVA BE'ER YITZCHAK: $20k → 10%CHABAD OF ENGLEWOOD: $7k → 7%BRIS AVRAHAM: $4k → 10%ENGLEWOOD TORAH CENTER: $4k → 7%CHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM: $4k → 10%CHABAD OF ENGLEWOOD: $3k → 7%EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE: $2k → 7%FRISCH SCHOOL: $18k → 7%FRISCH SCHOOL: $18k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$1.1M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+36%

Still filing today

26%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Frisch School
    2× · 2020–2021 · $36k · revenue +39%
  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD
    2× · 2020–2021 · $27k · revenue +40%
  • JR
    JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • MT
    MONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -29%
  • TS
    THE SYNAGOGUE OF HILTON HOTEL
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana

Religious education

Education
4
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
5
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
6
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
10
Orangetown Monsey Hebrew School

A. establish, maintain and conduct a school or schools of learning for the members of the jewish faith. b. to train and instruct boys and young men of the jewish faith in the tradition and cultures of the jewish faith. c. to promote the…

Education
11
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ben and Esther Rosenbloom Hillel Center for Jewish Life At University of Md; the most unlike its peers is Bris Avrohom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $286,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $88,800 · OtherJEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH: $58,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAHCHABAD OF THE SHORE: $49,400 · OtherEAST HILL SYNAGOGUE: $46,180 · OtherCONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL: $41,030 · Other+22 more: $151,440 · Other+22 moreBRIS AVROHOM INC: $149,000 · ReligionBRIS AVROHOM IN…MONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC: $10,000 · ReligionMONMOUTH TORAH …+2 more: $9,580 · Religion+2 moreThe Frisch School: $36,000 · EducationMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $26,725 · EducationSharsheret Inc: $540 · Health
Other$986,050Religion$168,580Education$62,725Health$540

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Frisch School: $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $26,725 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $5,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM INC: $4,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIS AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frisch School ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY26× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Lee and Cheryl Lasher Family Foundation Inc · Uriel Charitable Foundation · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Keren Yitzchak’s filings →

More from the funding graph