Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kelly Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$21kReligion$8kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
CHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM$1,000
SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%ST BONAVENTURE ANNUAL GIVING FUND: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $1k → 13%CHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 14%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $500 → 16%BISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL BATON ROUGE: $1k → 19%NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $1k → 23%ST BONAVENTURE ANNUAL GIVING FUND: $1k → 10%CHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 14%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $500 → 16%BISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL BATON ROUGE: $1k → 19%NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $1k → 23%CHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 14%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $500 → 16%BISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL BATON ROUGE: $500 → 19%NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $1k → 23%CHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 14%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $500 → 16%OUR LADY OF MERCY CHURCH: $2k → 19%NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $1k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $500 → 16%OUR LADY OF MERCY CHURCH: $1k → 19%NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $1k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY CHURCH: $1k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: $1k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY CHURCH: $1k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: $1k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: $1k → 23%MOUNT CARMEL ACADEMY: $1k → 23%MOUNT CARMEL ACADEMY: $1k → 23%MOUNT CARMEL ACADEMY: $1k → 23%MOUNT CARMEL ACADEMY: $1k → 23%ST MARY'S DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 23%ST MARY'S DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 23%ST MARY'S DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 23%NEW ORLEANS OPERA ASSN: $1k → 23%JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 23%JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 23%JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$43k
$0

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2023 · $6k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue -9%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF MERCY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2022 · $5k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    3/4
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOLOUR LADY OF MERCY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF MERCY CATHOLIC CHURCHMT CARMEL ACADEMY: $4,000 · OtherMT CARMEL ACADEMYCHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherCHAMINADE-JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: $3,100 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANSST MARYS DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherST MARYS DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOLBISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL BATON ROUGE: $2,500 · OtherBISHOP'S ANNUAL APPEAL BATON ROUGESISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR: $2,500 · OtherSISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMURST BONAVENTURE ANNUAL GIVING FUND: $2,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE ANNUAL GIVING FUNDTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WOR…NEW ORLEANS OPERA ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · Arts & CultureNEW ORLEANS OPER…University of Dayton: $4,000 · EducationUniversity o…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,000 · EducationUniversity o…
    Other$32,100Arts & Culture$6,500Education$5,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS OPERA ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
    • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
    • Who funds NEW ORLEANS OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Kelly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kelly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Kelly Family Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Kelly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Kelly Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph