Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jwt Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$223k
Granted FY2019
23
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Animals$148kArts & Culture$120kHealth$110kEducation$102kReligion$55kPhilanthropy$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2019 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS$30,000
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIATY$25,000
M AND M COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH$15,000
UNIV OF WI FND$15,000
COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BCH$10,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$10,000
BAY AREA MEDICAL FND$10,000
VERO BEACH ART MUSEUM$10,000
RIVERSIDE THEATRE$10,000
MUSIC IST OF CHICAGO$10,000
INTL CRANE FDN$10,000
HADLEY SCHOOL$5,000
TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD$5,000
CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDENS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HADLEY SCHOOL: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE TRUST: $25k → 14%VERO BEACH ART MUSEUM: $10k → 12%STENPHENSON TWP FIRE DEPT: $5k → 12%INTL CRANE FDN: $10k → 9%UNIV OF WI FND: $15k → 10%BAY AREA MEDICAL FND: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS: $30k → 9%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $10k → 12%FIELD MUSEUM: $5k → 14%HADLEY SCHOOL: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE TRUST: $25k → 14%VERO BEACH AR T MUSEUM: $10k → 12%STENPHENSON TWP FIRE DEPT: $5k → 12%INTL CRANE FDN: $10k → 9%UNIV OF WI FND: $15k → 10%BAY AREA MEDICAL FND: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS: $30k → 9%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $10k → 12%FIELD MUSEUM: $5k → 14%VERO BEACH ART MUSEUM: $10k → 12%M AND M COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%UNIV OF WI FND: $15k → 10%BAY AREA MEDICAL FND: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS: $25k → 9%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $10k → 12%FIELD MUSEUM: $5k → 14%RIVERSIDE THEATRE: $10k → 12%TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD: $5k → 12%ART INST OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%RIVERSIDE THEATRE: $10k → 12%TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD: $5k → 12%ART INST OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%JOHNS ISLAND COMM SVCS LEAGUE: $5k → 12%TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD: $5k → 12%ART INST OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%J I FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 14%MUSIC IST OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIATY: $25k → 14%MUSIC IST OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIATY: $25k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIATY: $25k → 14%KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BEACH: $10k → 12%KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BCH: $10k → 12%KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
CO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 23 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$587k
$25k

Still filing today

35%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
AnimalsEducationArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Chicago Zoological Society
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +43%
  • INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +57%
  • TB
    TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BEACH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CB
    CHICAGO BOTONICAL GARDENS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF VERO BEACH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Racine Zoological Society Inc

The mission of the racine zoological society is to foster an enlightening and affordable wildlife experience that improves the bond between people and nature. the society will provide for the recreation and education of the people, the…

Animals
2
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
5
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
7
Florida Children's Museum Inc

Curating the world for all children to explore

Arts & Culture
8
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

To excite, engage and educate through the arts.

Arts & Culture
9
Bainbridge Island Museum of Art

Bainbridge island museum of art (bima) inspires curiosity, wonder and understanding by connecting people with the contemporary art and craft of the puget sound region.

Arts & Culture
10
Frederik Meijer Gardens & Sculpture Foundation

The frederik meijer gardens & sculpture foundation is a single purpose foundation with an endowment fund to support the frederik meijer gardens & sculpture park. the most significant activities for the year were the investment decisions…

Environment
11
The Museum of Language Arts Inc

Planet word is a museum that inspires and renews a love of words, language, and reading through unique, immersive learning experiences. it provides a space to explore words and language that is grounded in a solid understanding of language…

Arts & Culture
12
Red River Zoological Society

As conservation leaders, the red river zoo connects our community to nature and inspires people to help save species.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is Twin Bridge Rescue Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS: $85,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSFRIENDS OF WILDLIFE TRUST: $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WILDLIFE TRUSTUNIV OF WI FND: $45,000 · OtherUNIV OF WI FNDKENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherKENILWORTH UNION CHURCHVERO BEACH ART MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherVERO BEACH ART MUSEUMTEACH FOR AMERICA: $30,000 · OtherTEACH FOR AMERICABAY AREA MEDICAL FND: $25,000 · OtherBAY AREA MEDICAL FNDMUSIC IST OF CHICAGO: $25,000 · OtherMUSIC IST OF CHICAGOJOHNS ISLAND COMM SVCS LEAGUE: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $94,500 · Other+11 moreChicago Zoological Society: $75,000 · AnimalsChicago Zoologica…INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRA…RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15,000 · EducationTWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterM & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$434,500Animals$97,500Arts & Culture$35,000Education$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,000Philanthropy$15,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Zoological Society: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetM & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds M & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jwt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jwt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jwt Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jwt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jwt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph