· Public charity
The Justin Thomas Foundation Inc
The foundation's charitable mission is to positively impact children in need, support junior golf programs, and provide assistance to military families - all with the intent of motivating these talented individuals to achieve their full potential.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC | $100,000 |
| DREAM FOUNDATION | $65,056 |
| OHOOPEE MATCH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PALM BEACH COUNTY | $25,500 |
| USA CARES | $20,000 |
| DOGS HELPING HEROES | $12,000 |
| FIRST TEE - PINE MOUNTAIN | $9,200 |
| KENTUCKY GOLF FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC4× · 2020–2023 · $234k · revenue +62%
- UCUSA CARES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +201%
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC2× · 2022–2023 · $86k · revenue +19%
Funded once
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +78%- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +27%
- TBTRANSFORMATIONS BY TUSCALOOSA ANGELSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Youth health and social, educational, and character development of youth.
To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in georgia; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys(continued on schedule o) and girls in…
Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.
The boys and girls clubs of the gulf coast, inc is a non-profit corporation formed to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, and character development of all boys and girls throughout the gulf coast area.
To provide support for the boys & girls clubs, inc. which provides various educational and recreational services to youth.
The mission of boys and girls clubs of greater washington is to help boys and girls of all backgrounds, especially those who need us most, build confidence, develop character and acquire the skills needed to become productive,…
To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Pbc and the most unlike its peers is Plymouth County Family Support Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds USA CARES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
- Who funds OHOOPEE MATCH CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY GOLF ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY TUSCALOOSA ANGELS ↗
- Who funds THE DREAM FACTORY INC - HEADQUARTERS ↗
- Who funds Dogs Helping Heroes Inc ↗
- Who funds TFT INC ↗
- Who funds Plymouth County Family Support Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Justin Thomas Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Plymouth County Family Support Inc — 96% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.