· Public charity
Junior League of Kansas City Missouri
The junior league of kansas city, missouri (jlkcmo) is a 501(c)(3) organziation of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $28,170 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $78,855 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,685 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BALLET NORTH | $7,500 |
| LORRAINE'S HOUSE | $7,500 |
| ROSE BROOK'S | $7,500 |
| WORNALL MAJORS HOUSE MUSEUMS INC | $5,670 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HAPPYBOTTOMS3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +129%- KCKansas City Hospice Inc4× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +23%
- APAmethyst Place Inc3× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +600%
Funded once
- LMLAZARUS MINISTRIES KCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +86%
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +21%
- AOAVENUE OF LIFE INCgraduated2× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +138%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
All of Cornerstone efforts are directed toward interrupting the cycle of homelessness, providing decent, safe, accessible and affordable housing of choice to moderate and low-income households, and revitalizing Topeka neighborhoods.
ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.
KC Tenants organizes to ensure that everyone in Kansas City has a safe, accessible, and truly affordable home.
We exist to welcome our new-American neighbors with Gospel-focused ministries of mercy so they might know, love, and follow Jesus into His Kingdom
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
Front Porch Alliance works together with residents of Kansas City, Missouris eastside and urban core to meet their changing needs at home and in school.
Nurture kc is a community collaboration dedicated to reducting infant mortality and improving family health. we work together to change policy for broad impact, transform systems to improve health outcomes at a local level, and provide…
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stonelion Puppet Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAPPYBOTTOMS ↗
- Who funds Kansas City Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds Amethyst Place Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY YOUNG AUDIENCES INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS MINISTRIES KC ↗
- Who funds HARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AVENUE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds LORRAINE'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI ↗
- Who funds HILLCREST MINISTRIES OF MIDAMERICA ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Mothers Refuge ↗
- Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds PLATTE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds WORNALL-MAJORS HOUSE MUSEUMS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
- Who funds Wildwood Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds STONELION PUPPET THEATRE ↗
- Who funds RESTART INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHADOW BUDDIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEVELUP KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY ↗
- Who funds Journey to New Life INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE ↗
- Who funds The Whole Person Inc ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Forward Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Servant Foundation · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Junior League of Kansas City Missouri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.