· Public charity
The Julio A Martinez Memorial Fund
Provide academic, emotional, financial and/or other relevant support for children from all areas of new york.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $509,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $528,040 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,040 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $202k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Promesa Inc | $300,000 |
| Acacia Gardens Affordable LLC | $49,000 |
| Crotona Park Residences LLC | $40,000 |
| Promesa HDFC | $37,000 |
| EL OTRO PUERTO RICO INC | $20,000 |
| Grand Street Settlement | $19,000 |
| Urban Renaissance Collaboration LP | $17,000 |
| DORILL INITIATIVE INC | $10,000 |
| OUT OF DARKNESS | $10,000 |
| Promesa Court LP | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +262% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $489k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOOut of The Darkness Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue 0% · 38% of their budget
- CVCarlos Vazquez Consulting2× · 2023–2024 · $32k
- DIDORILL INITIATIVE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $18k · revenue +262%
Funded once
- ANAcacia Network Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue ×21
- CTCreative Therapeuticsone grant, 2019 · $32k
- LILoisaida Incone grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue -30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides temporary housing and housing assistance to homeless families and singles in new york city; provides ancillary social services, food, clothing, access to medical services and finds permanent housing and jobs to those families.
Acacia puerto rico was formed to own, operate and maintain housing for low and moderate income individuals and families. currently, the corporation assists individuals and families with connections to social services.
To establish, maintain and operate a diagnostic and treatment center or centers to provide ambulatory patient care and treatment.
To assist immigrant farmworkers in Western and Central New York by providing resources to immigrant farmworkers and their families to navigate language and cultural barriers (Continued on Schedule O)and by educating communities about…
To develop the intellectual and creative minds of latino youth to enter and continue their education in the professions, arts, and technical fields to solve community problems.
Legal, immigration and community organizing
To foster growth and development,primarily of hispanics, by providing advocacy, along with culturally sensitive programs and services, which are intended to raise their socioeconomic status, well being, and citizenship awareness.
To build on the rich cultural heritage of the latino community by advancing its independence and growth through advocacy, counseling, and education.
Bronx overall economic development corporation (the "corporation") is a new york nonprofit organization, organized in 1981. the corporation was established to promote economic growth in the bronx, new york by providing loans and grants to…
The company is involved in acquiring and managing residential dwelling units primarily in the south bronx, for low income families.
The objective and mission of the corporation shall be to ensure the availability of funding to support the development, expansion and delivery of the highest quality effective and efficient primary care services, coupled with additional…
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital District Latinos Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little League Raiders Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Promesa Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Acacia Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Promesa Housing Development Fund Corporation Inc ↗
- Who funds Out of The Darkness Inc ↗
- Who funds Loisaida Inc ↗
- Who funds Hispanos Unidos De Buffalo ↗
- Who funds Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds Capital District Latinos Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLEGANY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM - SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DORILL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE RAIDERS BASEBALL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Julio A Martinez Memorial Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Julio A Martinez Memorial Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Julio A Martinez Memorial Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.