Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joyce E Haseotes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$121kAnimals$103kReligion$25kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$2kHuman Services$2k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$426k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE MISSION$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
ST GEORGE GREEK CHURCH$1,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,000
ST MARK CHURCH$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJRCT$500
SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJRCT: $500 → 14%THE SEEING EYE INC: $500 → 4%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJRCT: $500 → 14%THE SEEING EYE INC: $500 → 4%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJRCT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJRCT: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$223k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+95%

Still filing today

65%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COLD NOSES FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +454% · 53% of their budget
  • OM
    ONE MISSION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +26%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LH
    LAHEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
3
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
4
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
5
Animal Angels
—
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
8
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
9
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
10
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
11
Animal Diplomacy

Supporting and assisting with rescue, sheltering, spay/neuter, and rehoming of cats and dogs in needy developing countries. Our current exclusive focus is on Egypt and the Egyptian Society for Mercy to Animals.

Animals
12
Kiss for Homeless Animals
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cold Noses Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLD NOSES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · AnimalsCOLD NOSES FOUNDATION INCTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF C…Humane World for Animals Inc: $4,000 · Animals+5 more: $6,500 · Animals+5 moreONE MISSION INC: $80,000 · HealthONE MISSION INC+3 more: $5,200 · Health+3 moreLAHEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · OtherLAHEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERST GEORGE GREEK CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherST GEORGE GREEK CHURCHST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $6,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $6,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITA…ST MARK CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherST MARK CHURCHAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIE: $2,500 · Other+7 more: $8,450 · Other+7 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEGASUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$102,000Health$85,200Other$67,450Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLD NOSES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 7y, 53% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $80,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEGASUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLD NOSES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEGASUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joyce E Haseotes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joyce E Haseotes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joyce E Haseotes Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Joyce E Haseotes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joyce E Haseotes’ filings →

More from the funding graph