How much did THE JOSEPH AND CAROLYN DEMARCO grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of THE JOSEPH AND CAROLYN DEMARCO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

mother consolation

2020

—

2021

mother consolation

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k10 grants · $189k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES$34,000
NATURAL LANDS$25,000
OUR MOTHER OF CONSOLATION CYO$25,000
MADISON SQUARE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY NJ$20,000
NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST$15,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$12,500
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY$12,500
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$10,000
MARINA ORTH FOUNDATION$10,000
COLLEGE SETTLEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 63% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$566k · 11 repeat orgs$333k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$566k

$263k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%

+110%

Still filing today

36%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UP
URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES
6× · 2019–2024 · $129k
NL
NATURAL LANDS
3× · 2019–2024 · $75k
VU
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
6× · 2019–2024 · $73k · revenue +31%

Funded once

MS
MADISON SQUARE BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $100k
AH
ALS HOPE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +321%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

San Francisco Girls' School

to educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—

The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education

New Foundations Charter School

The mission is to provide students with the academic, social and emotional foundations and skills necessary to become high achieving, socially competent stewards of their communities. the founders of the new foundations charter school will…

Education

Charlottesville Waldorf School

Charlottesville waldorf school mission statementapproved by the college of teachers, june 18, 2010 the charlottesville waldorf school offers a curriculum rich in academic, artistic, practical, and physical activities in an inclusive and…

Education

The Gifted Child Society

The purpose of the gifted child society is to encourage and further the overall well-being of gifted children, through each stage of their development and to provide them with inspiration to achieve their full potential.

Education

The Genesis Foundation for Children

The mission of the genesis foundation for children is to provide funding for the diagnosis and compassionate, coordinated care of children born with physical, intellectual, developmental, and genetic disorders, and to aid them in achieving…

—

Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation of global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—

The Magellan School

To prepare children to become global citizens of the 21st century. to provide them with the knowledge, skills and values needed to navigate through an increasingly competitive, multilingual and multicultuiral world. in an increasingly…

Education

Boys' & Girls' Club of Chester

The organization's mission is to nurture the development of our young people and guide them along the path to future success by providing an environment that supports excellence

—

The Gray Charter School

The charter schools mission is to provide its diverse student body the best possible education by focusing on the fundamental academic disciplines in an atmosphere that affirms academic.

Education

Children First

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—

Collegium Charter School

Collegium charter school's mission is to educate students to reach their fullest academic potential, while simultaneously engaging them in the exploration of college, community, and career opportunities. we strive to empower students to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adoption Center and the most unlike its peers is Starfinder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/13

Grantees still filing

9/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$589,100Education$159,500Health$60,000Youth Development$60,000Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust UwPA13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE JOSEPH AND CAROLYN DEMARCO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MARINA ORTH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270115624 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MARINA ORTH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Joseph and Carolyn Demarco?

Find your warmest path to The Joseph and Carolyn Demarco through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE JOSEPH AND CAROLYN DEMARCO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Joseph and Carolyn Demarco?

More from the funding graph

THE JOSEPH AND CAROLYN DEMARCO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Joseph and Carolyn Demarco?

More from the funding graph