Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John Martin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$43MInternational$15MHuman Services$2.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.5MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$312kReligion$160kPhilanthropy$150k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $12M
$250,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$5,500,000
MYRIAD USA INC$1,500,000
ARANDA ORG INC$1,250,000
PHARMACCESS FOUNDATION$1,000,000
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,000,000
CENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$394,478
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$250,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$250,000
TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH COALITION FOR GLOBAL HEPATITIS ELIMINATION$238,563
Individual grant recipient$236,348
WORLD HEPATITIS ALLIANCE$150,000
THE GLOBAL HEPATITIS ASSOCIATION$150,000
TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH COALITION FOR GLOBAL HEPATITIS ELIMINATION$150,000
SOCIETY ON LIVER DISEASE IN AFRICA$58,771
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($44M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($19M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $100k → 14%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $100k → 14%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($19M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$8.7M · 11 grants
India$5.8M · 5 grants
Switzerland$1.7M · 10 grants
Norway$1.5M · 5 grants
China$731k · 5 grants
Argentina$444k · 8 grants
Canada$300k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The John Martin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 21% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 11%.

The John Martin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 55% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55M · 18 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$55M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+17%

Still filing today

22%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6.8M · revenue -21%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +74% · 49% of their budget
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5.8M

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS
    one grant, 2017 · $1.1M
  • BD
    BEIJING DITAN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $400k
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE
    one grant, 2020 · $396k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
2
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
7
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Myriad Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Melbourne Usa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5,800,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINELIVER FOUNDATION WEST BENGAL: $5,771,913 · OtherLIVER FOUNDATION WEST BENGALPHARM ACCESS FOUNDATION: $5,747,812 · OtherPHARM ACCESS FOUNDATIONTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $5,000,000 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGOARANDAORG INC: $5,000,000 · OtherARANDAORG INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,980,133 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPHARM ACCESS FOUNDATION THE NETHERLANDS: $2,814,220 · OtherPHARM ACCESS FOUNDATION THE NETHERLANDSNEW DISCOVERY LLC: $2,706,166 · OtherNEW DISCOVERY LLCWORLD HEPATITIS ALLIANCE: $1,670,000 · Other+18 more: $6,854,904 · Other+18 moreTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $6,800,000 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH IN…CENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,949,020 · HealthCENTER FOR DISEASE ANAL…+2 more: $312,045 · HealthMYRIAD USA INC: $3,300,000 · InternationalPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $898,691 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · Education+1 more: $15,000 · EducationTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $150,000 · Philanthropy
Other$45,345,148Health$13,061,065International$3,300,000Education$1,163,691Human Services$300,000Philanthropy$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $6,800,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,949,020 over 6y, 49% of budgetARANDAORG INC: $5,000,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $3,300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $898,691 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE USA FOUNDATION: $340,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL VIRUS NETWORK INC: $216,800 over 1y, 39% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFORMED HORIZONS EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISEASE ANALYSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARANDAORG INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL VIRUS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INFORMED HORIZONS EDUCATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Raymond F Schinazi & Family FoundationGA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond F Schinazi & Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John Martin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John Martin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John Martin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The John Martin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Martin’s filings →

More from the funding graph