Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of THE JOHN M & LINDA J KELLY FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HIVE INC$15,000
KENTUCKY KIDS ON THE BLOCK$12,500
PERSPECTIVE SKILLS FOR LIFE INCENTIVES$10,000
OPERATION PRIDE$10,000
ST GIANNA CRISIS CENTER$9,500
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,500
ST JOESPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
WKU LIFEWORKS$5,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$4,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL KY$2,500
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KY$2,500
HADLEY JO FOUNDATION$2,000
MED CENTER HEALTH ADULT DAY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$573k · 20 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
23

Total granted

$573k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+13%

Still filing today

35%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +258%
  • HI
    HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +486%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WF
    WKU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2019 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation
2
Kentucky Special Parent Involvement Network Inc

To empower and support individuals with disabilities and their families to effectively advocate for and access needed information, resources and support networks in order to enhance the quality of their lives.

Education
3
Bleeding Disorders of Kentucky Inc

Bleeding disorders of kentucky (bdoky) is dedicated to improving the quality of life for individuals with inheritable bleeding disorders through education, engagement, and support.

Health
4
Realtor Community Housing Foundation Inc

None

Housing & Shelter
5
Community Action Kentucky Inc

To advocate programs providing assistance to persons in low income environments to have adequate food, shelter, healthcare, education, water, waste and a sustainable home.

Community Improvement
6
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
7
Helping Hounds Find Homesinc

Saving the lives of homeless and unwanted pets in harrison county kentucky and surrounding areas.

Animals
8
Southern Tier Housing Corporation

To provide families with the opportunity to build and own an energy efficient homne in 9 impoverished kentucky counties of cumberland, clinton, wayne, mccreary, whitley, bell, laurel, rockcastle, pulaski, and adjacent regions.

Housing & Shelter
9
Kentucky Heartland Outreach Inc

Kentucky heartland outreach's mission is to provide safe, warm, and dry homes to homeowners who cannot afford to make much needed home repairs. kentucky heartland outreach performs a wide variety of rehabilitation work including but not…

10
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

11
Kentucky Saving Them Together Inc
Animals
12
Wolfe County Search and Rescue Inc

Lost person search and rescue operations health-related rescue operations and mutual aide operations with law enforcement, other search and rescue teams, and other governmental agencies.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Ky Kids On the Block Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Sheriffs' Boys & Girls Ranch Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WKU LIFEWORKS — $138,537 · OtherWKU LIFEWORKSWKU — $49,500 · OtherWKUBRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUND — $40,000 · OtherBRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUNDBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT — $36,969 · OtherBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH — $34,600 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCHKENTUCKY KIDS ON THE BLOCK — $29,500 · OtherWKU FOUNDATION — $26,000 · OtherKIDS ON THE BLOCK — $22,200 · OtherBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH SCHOOL — $19,500 · Other+29 more — $142,870 · Other+29 moreCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc — $44,000 · HealthCommonwealth He…HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC — $34,000 · HealthHABILITATION IN…PROJECT CAMP INC — $14,000 · HealthPROJECT CAMP IN…SAVE A WARRIOR INC — $10,000 · HealthSAVE A WARRIOR …+1 more — $2,000 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $32,500 · Housing & ShelterLIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC — $19,974 · PhilanthropyOPERATION PRIDE INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentSmoky Mountain Service Dogs — $6,500 · Human ServicesARTS OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$580,676Health$104,000Housing & Shelter$52,500Philanthropy$19,974Environment$10,000Human Services$6,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc — $44,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC — $34,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $32,500 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetLIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC — $19,974 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL KY KIDS ON THE BLOCK INC — $14,700 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPROJECT CAMP INC — $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION PRIDE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE A WARRIOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs — $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARTS OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWROTE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY SHERIFFS' BOYS & GIRLS RANCH TRUST — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds LIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL KY KIDS ON THE BLOCK INC
  • Who funds PROJECT CAMP INC
  • Who funds OPERATION PRIDE INC
  • Who funds SAVE A WARRIOR INC
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Service Dogs
  • Who funds HADLEY JO FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scariot Family Foundation IncKY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scariot Family Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky Inc · The Jerry E Baker Foundation Inc · The Harold Juanita David Dennis & Gary Koon Family Charitable Foundation · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph