Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$197kHealth$140kEducation$67kCivil Rights$65kRecreation & Sports$59kYouth Development$57kEmployment$51kReligion$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HIVE INC$15,000
KENTUCKY KIDS ON THE BLOCK$12,500
PERSPECTIVE SKILLS FOR LIFE INCENTIVES$10,000
OPERATION PRIDE$10,000
ST GIANNA CRISIS CENTER$9,500
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,500
WKU LIFEWORKS$5,000
ST JOESPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$4,500
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KY$2,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL KY$2,500
HADLEY JO FOUNDATION$2,000
MED CENTER HEALTH ADULT DAY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%SMOKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 90%.

The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 20 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
23

Total granted

$573k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+2%

Still filing today

35%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +258%
  • HI
    HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +486%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WF
    WKU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2019 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation
—
2
Kentucky Special Parent Involvement Network Inc

To empower and support individuals with disabilities and their families to effectively advocate for and access needed information, resources and support networks in order to enhance the quality of their lives.

Education
3
Bleeding Disorders of Kentucky Inc

Bleeding disorders of kentucky (bdoky) is dedicated to improving the quality of life for individuals with inheritable bleeding disorders through education, engagement, and support.

Health
4
Realtor Community Housing Foundation Inc

None

Housing & Shelter
5
Community Action Kentucky Inc

To advocate programs providing assistance to persons in low income environments to have adequate food, shelter, healthcare, education, water, waste and a sustainable home.

Community Improvement
6
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
7
Helping Hounds Find Homesinc

Saving the lives of homeless and unwanted pets in harrison county kentucky and surrounding areas.

Animals
8
Southern Tier Housing Corporation

To provide families with the opportunity to build and own an energy efficient homne in 9 impoverished kentucky counties of cumberland, clinton, wayne, mccreary, whitley, bell, laurel, rockcastle, pulaski, and adjacent regions.

Housing & Shelter
9
Kentucky Heartland Outreach Inc

Kentucky heartland outreach's mission is to provide safe, warm, and dry homes to homeowners who cannot afford to make much needed home repairs. kentucky heartland outreach performs a wide variety of rehabilitation work including but not…

—
10
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
11
Kentucky Saving Them Together Inc
Animals
12
Wolfe County Search and Rescue Inc

Lost person search and rescue operations health-related rescue operations and mutual aide operations with law enforcement, other search and rescue teams, and other governmental agencies.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Ky Kids On the Block Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Sheriffs' Boys & Girls Ranch Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WKU LIFEWORKS: $138,537 · OtherWKU LIFEWORKSWKU: $49,500 · OtherWKUBRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUND: $40,000 · OtherBRIDGE TO INDEPENDENCE FUNDBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $36,969 · OtherBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $34,600 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCHKENTUCKY KIDS ON THE BLOCK: $29,500 · OtherWKU FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherKIDS ON THE BLOCK: $22,200 · OtherBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH SCHOOL: $19,500 · Other+29 more: $142,870 · Other+29 moreCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc: $44,000 · HealthCommonwealth He…HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC: $34,000 · HealthHABILITATION IN…PROJECT CAMP INC: $14,000 · HealthPROJECT CAMP IN…SAVE A WARRIOR INC: $10,000 · HealthSAVE A WARRIOR …+1 more: $2,000 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $32,500 · Housing & ShelterLIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC: $19,974 · PhilanthropyOPERATION PRIDE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $6,500 · Human ServicesARTS OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$580,676Health$104,000Housing & Shelter$52,500Philanthropy$19,974Environment$10,000Human Services$6,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc: $44,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC: $34,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $32,500 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetLIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC: $19,974 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL KY KIDS ON THE BLOCK INC: $14,700 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPROJECT CAMP INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION PRIDE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE A WARRIOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARTS OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWROTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHADLEY JO FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY SHERIFFS' BOYS & GIRLS RANCH TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABILITATION INFORMATION VOCATION EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE THE DREAM DEVELOPMENT INC % CATHERINE MILLER EXEC DIRECTOR ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL KY KIDS ON THE BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION PRIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A WARRIOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Smoky Mountain Service Dogs ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scariot Family Foundation IncKY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scariot Family Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky Inc · The Jerry E Baker Foundation Inc · The Harold Juanita David Dennis & Gary Koon Family Charitable Foundation · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John M & Linda J Kelly Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph