Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John a & Dora Neild Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kHealth$33kHuman Services$13kInternational$5kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEHEMIAH'S VISION INC$10,000
LIFE POINT CHURCH$10,000
BEAUMONT'S FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
SHRINERS BURN HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55k · 3 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$55k
$84k

Still filing today

0%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SHRINERS BURN HOSPITAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k
  • BF
    BEAUMONT'S FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k
  • LP
    LIFE POINT CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • SB
    SHRINERS BURNS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • SM
    STUDENT MOBILIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS BURN HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherSHRINERS BURN HOSPITALBEAUMONT'S FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $17,500 · OtherBEAUMONT'S FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHLIFE POINT CHURCH: $17,500 · OtherLIFE POINT CHURCHSHRINERS BURNS HOSPITAL: $12,524 · OtherSHRINERS BURNS HOSPITALSTUDENT MOBILIZATION INC: $12,000 · OtherSTUDENT MOBILIZATION INCFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $4,709 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,708 · Other+2 more: $5,000 · OtherNEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionMINERAL COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $250 · Health
Other$132,189Human Services$10,000Religion$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,500Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINERAL COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEHEMIAH'S VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MINERAL COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John a & Dora Neild Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John a & Dora Neild Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John a & Dora Neild Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The John a & Dora Neild Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John a & Dora Neild Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph