Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Johanna K and Jeffrey T Black Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$547kYouth Development$500kSocial Science$438kPhilanthropy$145kReligion$120kEnvironment$25kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS$100,000
ASPEN INSTITUTE$84,828
ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$21,000
BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL$10,000
CUREPSAP$5,000
BOSTON ATHENAEUM$5,000
ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$5,000
INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $115k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $100k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%CUREPSAP: $5k → 17%ASPEN INSTITUTE: $179k → 14%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $10k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $69k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $40k → 12%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $30k → 13%UMCP FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $60k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $100k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%ASPEN INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $5k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $40k → 12%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $30k → 13%UMCP FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $10k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $75k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%ASPEN INSTITUTE: $85k → 14%ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $5k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $40k → 12%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $30k → 13%UMCP FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $10k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $75k → 16%ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL: $5k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $10k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $75k → 16%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $10k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $75k → 16%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%BOSTON ATHENAEUM: $5k → 16%ART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDS: $500 → 16%COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER: $5k → 16%E INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-15%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $438k · revenue +91%
  • BA
    BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $215k · revenue +38%
  • Cornell University
    3× · 2020–2022 · $120k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CS
    COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EI
    E INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • AR
    ART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDS (ARCK) INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University of Calgary is a global intellectual hub located in Canada's most enterprising city. In this spirited, high quality learning environment students will thrive in programs made rich by research, hands-on experiences and…

—
10
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
11
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Aura provides innovative, open resources to enable discovery and excellence in research, to unify the astrophysics communities, and to promote public understanding of our universe and the benefits of scientific exploration.

Science & Tech
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Curepsp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $275,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MASSACHUSET…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $225,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSUMCP FOUNDATION: $120,000 · OtherUMCP FOUNDATION+3 more: $7,500 · OtherBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $215,000 · EducationBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOLCornell University: $120,000 · EducationCornell UniversityUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONOberlin College: $90,000 · EducationOberlin College+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $438,350 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $144,800 · PhilanthropyASPEN COM…ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $25,000 · EnvironmentCUREPSP INC: $5,000 · HealthART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDS (ARCK) INCORPORATED: $500 · Youth Development
Other$627,500Education$550,000Social Science$438,350Philanthropy$144,800Environment$25,000Health$5,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $438,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $215,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $144,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCornell University: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDS (ARCK) INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds PROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM ↗
  • Who funds CUREPSP INC ↗
  • Who funds ART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDS (ARCK) INCORPORATED ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Johanna K and Jeffrey T Black Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Johanna K and Jeffrey T Black Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Johanna K and Jeffrey T Black’s filings →

More from the funding graph