Skip to content

New York · Public charity

The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry initiatives.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.5M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,389,725
Organizations funded a year
3 to 10
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$81M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations The Jockey Club funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving6$1.5M17%
FY20233$1.5M33%
FY202210$3.5M50%
FY20216$1.6M33%
FY20207$1.7Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$7.4MRecreation & Sports$2.0MHealth$160kEducation$125kPhilanthropy$100kMembership Benefit$45kCivil Rights$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance$7,296,725556%
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Inc$1,868,907115%
Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc$100,00010%
Racing Officials Accreditationprogram Inc$87,500357%
University of Kentucky$75,0002n/a
Humane World for Animals Inc$70,00040%
Animal Wellness Action$70,00053%
University of California Davis$50,0001n/a
Racing Medication and Testing Consortium$50,00017%
Ed Brown Society Inc$50,000117%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of The Jockey Club by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance$7,296,725556%
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Inc$1,868,907115%
Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc$100,00010%
Racing Officials Accreditationprogram Inc$87,500357%
University of Kentucky$75,0002n/a
Humane World for Animals Inc$70,00040%
Animal Wellness Action$70,00053%
University of California Davis$50,0001n/a
Racing Medication and Testing Consortium$50,00017%
Ed Brown Society Inc$50,000117%
Horse Country Inc$45,00026%
Phoenix Rising of Lexington Kenutcky Inc$20,0001n/a
Amplify Horse Racing$20,00025%
American Heart Association Inc$10,00010%
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$10,00010%
Town Branch Park Inc$10,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

The Jockey Club supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance: $7,296,725 over 5y, 56% of budgetHorseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Inc: $1,868,907 over 1y, 15% of budgetResearch Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRacing Officials Accreditationprogram Inc: $87,500 over 3y, 57% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Wellness Action: $70,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetRacing Medication and Testing Consortium: $50,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetEd Brown Society Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHorse Country Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetAmplify Horse Racing: $20,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTown Branch Park Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Jockey Club with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jockey Club?

Find your warmest path to The Jockey Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Jockey Club

How much does The Jockey Club give?
The Jockey Club reported 7 itemized grants totaling $1,544,725, out of $1,621,475 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 10 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does The Jockey Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (75%), Recreation & Sports (20%), Health (2%).
Who are The Jockey Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance ($7.3M), Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Inc ($1.9M), Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc ($100k).
Does The Jockey Club fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Jockey Club?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc.
Where is The Jockey Club based?
The Jockey Club is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jockey Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph