· Public charity
The Jewish Federation of Middlesex & Monmouth Counties a Nj Nonprofit Corp
The jewish federation of middlesex and monmouth counties, a nj non-profit corporation, also known as the jewish federation in the heart of new jersey, brings together people, partners and resources to fulfill the most important needs and aspirations of our community.we care for the vulnerable locally and worldwide, forge strong…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF MIDDLESEX & MONMOUTH COUNTIES A NJ NONPROFIT CORP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $636,593 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,353,779 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $717,186 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $210k
- $250k+1 grant · $254k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE (JFS) | $253,675 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES | $110,305 |
| RABBI PESACH RAMON YESHIVA | $99,247 |
| THE HEBREW ACADEMY | $41,010 |
| JCC COMMUNITY CENTER | $36,000 |
| NETIVOT | $34,356 |
| JSS AGENCY | $28,800 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE | $25,200 |
| AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.
Grants abroad, by region — $156k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM · SPECIAL NEEDS · EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE
Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against -64% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JSJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +100%
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC7× · 2017–2024 · $218k · revenue +9%
- JSJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE OF NEW BRUNSWICK7× · 2017–2024 · $218k · revenue +91% · 35% of their budget
Funded once
- SSSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $86k
- HYHILLEL YESHIVAone grant, 2017 · $15k
- YAYESHIVA AT THE JERSEY SHORE INCone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue -64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.
Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The jewish association for community living responds to the needs of persons with developmental disabilities and their families in our community by providing quality support and services enhanced by jewish tradition.
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj and the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE OF NEW BRUNSWICK ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
- Who funds AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA AT THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jewish Federation of Middlesex & Monmouth Counties a Nj Nonprofit Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Axelrod Performing Arts Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.