Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jeffrey D Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$53kPhilanthropy$41kAnimals$23kHealth$17kEnvironment$16kArts & Culture$15kInternational$4kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$991k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THETA XI FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION$10,000
THE WALL THAT HEALS ORANGE - 2025$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$3,000
CAGE TO COUCH$2,500
BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT$2,500
LADY FREETHINKER$2,500
CITY OF HOPE$2,500
PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBL$2,500
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITAL$2,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$2,000
BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL$524
ST LAWRENCE MARTYR CATHOLIC CHURCH$103
GUARDIAN RENEWAL PROJECT$77
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESERVE ORANGE COUNTY: $5k → 10%BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $4k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $4k → 17%PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBL: $3k → 14%GUARDIAN RENEWAL PROJECT: $77 → 6%NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FND: $4k → 11%LAUGHS FOR TROOPS: $20k → 13%THETA XI FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $3k → 17%CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITAL: $3k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1k → 13%PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE WALL THAT HEALS ORANGE - 2025: $3k → 10%BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $3k → 14%ASPCA: $1k → 17%LAUGHS FOR TROOPS: $20k → 13%THETA XI FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITAL: $2k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $40 → 13%PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CAGE TO COUCH: $5k → 10%LOS ANGELES MISSION: $2k → 14%ASPCA: $1k → 17%LAUGHS FOR TROOPS: $10k → 13%THETA XI FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITAL: $2k → 8%PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CAGE TO COUCH: $3k → 10%BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $2k → 14%ASPCA: $1k → 17%LAUGHS FOR TROOPS: $10k → 13%THETA XI FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CAGE TO COUCH: $3k → 10%LOS ANGELES MISSION: $2k → 14%LAUGHS FOR TROOPS: $10k → 13%THETA XI FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL: $524 → 14%LADY FREETHINKER: $3k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $3k → 14%INTERNATIONAL PRINTING MUSEUM: $5k → 14%ST LAWRENCE MARTYR CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 14%ST LAWRENCE MARTYR CATHOLIC CHURCH: $103 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
UT
MO
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 12 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$219k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TX
    THETA XI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +23%
  • PT
    PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $41k · revenue +8%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    3× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PRINTING MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NC
    NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FND
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
4
American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Asps promotes the highest standards in advocacy, research, education, patient safety, and ethical standards for plastic surgery, our members, and their patients.

—
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
7
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
10
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Americans for Medical Progress Educational Foundation

Dedicated to protecting your investment in biomedical research. we focus on public outreach that builds understanding and appreciation for necessary and humane animal research. we also provide vital news, information and analysis to…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beagle Freedom Project; the most unlike its peers is Cage to Couch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $52,835 · OtherTHETA XI FOUNDATIONPRESERVE ORANGE COUNTY INC: $16,000 · OtherPRESERVE ORANGE COUNTY INCCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $6,640 · OtherOLD TOWNE PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Other+8 more: $18,320 · Other+8 morePAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $40,875 · PhilanthropyPAT TILLMAN FOUNDA…CAGE TO COUCH INC: $9,635 · AnimalsCAGE TO C…BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $8,000 · AnimalsBEAGLE FR…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,040 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterLADY FREETHINKER: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$170,295Philanthropy$40,875Animals$20,635Health$6,540International$4,000Housing & Shelter$4,000Civil Rights$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $52,835 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $40,875 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAGE TO COUCH INC: $9,635 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $6,640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD TOWNE PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jeffrey D Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jeffrey D Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jeffrey D Campbell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jeffrey D Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffrey D Campbell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph