Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jds Manna Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$34kHealth$22kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$9kYouth Development$6kReligion$5kFood & Nutrition$4kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY NAZARENE CHURCH$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,360
RANDY WISE CLIO INC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,655
MDA FOUNDATION$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF MID MICHIGAN$1,500
HAND OF HOPE - FLM$1,500
GOFUNDME INC$510
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MICHIGAN$38
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EXCEPTIONAL HEROES: $1k → 16%HAND OF HOPE: $3k → 16%HAND OF HOPE - FLM: $2k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF MID MICHIGAN: $2k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF GENESEE COUNTY: $1k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF GENESEE COUNTY: $529 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Jds Manna Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 76%.

The Jds Manna Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 3 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
20

Total granted

$13k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
0%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIVER CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k
  • HO
    HAND OF HOPE-FLM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +117%
  • FP
    Family Promise of Mid Michigan
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • HF
    HURLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +48%
  • LG
    LORI GREENHAW ATTN BRIAN BETZOLD
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • GF
    GOFUNDME FOR PAUL BINGHAM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
2
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
3
Home Builders Association of Michigan

A voice of the building industry in Michigan. The primary purpose is to positively influence the legislative, regulatory and legal issues that affect the industry.

—
4
Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity

The mission of Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity is to improve lives in our community by building safe and affordable housing in partnership with Gods people.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
6
Transplant House of West Michigan

The Transplant House of West Michigan is organized to provide individuals and their families that are going through the organ transplant process an affordable temporary home away from home in West Michigan to ease the transitions of their…

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County

Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County, Inc (HFH) is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to expand affordable housing opportunities by partnering with people in our community. Applicants qualify for Habitat's homeownership…

Housing & Shelter
8
Homeless Action Network of Detroit

Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.

Human Services
9
About Face Detroit
—
10
Habitat for Humanity Detroit

To provide decent, affordable housing to low income families.

—
11
Hope Gain Center of West Michigan

To promote the well-being and economic self sufficiency of individuals living with mental illness by providing job training, placement services, and other resources that enable them to gain employment in remote work settings. Through our…

Employment
12
Fragile X Association of Michigan

Fragile X Association of Michigan unites the MI Fragile X community to: Enrich lives through educational & emotional support, promote public and professional awareness, advance research toward improved treatments and a cure for fragile X…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Xceptional Heroes; the most unlike its peers is Genesee County Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY NAZARENE CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherFAMILY NAZARENE CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $10,360 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTHE RIVER CHURCH: $5,240 · OtherTHE RIVER CHURCHLORI GREENHAW ATTN BRIAN BETZOLD: $5,000 · OtherLORI GREENHAW ATTN BRIAN BETZOLDGOFUNDME FOR PAUL BINGHAM: $5,000 · OtherGOFUNDME FOR PAUL BINGHAMBAKER COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherBAKER COLLEGELUKE PROJECT 52: $4,114 · OtherLUKE PROJECT 52RANDY WISE CLIO INC: $4,000 · OtherRANDY WISE CLIO INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,655 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,624 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,465 · Other+11 more: $9,636 · Other+11 moreHAND OF HOPE-FLM: $4,500 · Human ServicesHAND OF HO…Family Promise of Mid Michigan: $3,041 · Human ServicesFamily Pro…XCEPTIONAL HEROES: $1,000 · Human ServicesXCEPTIONAL…MICHIGAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationEton Academy: $2,200 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,000 · EducationHURLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsGOFUNDMEORG: $510 · Philanthropy
Other$72,094Human Services$8,541Education$5,700Civil Rights$5,000Philanthropy$510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHURLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAND OF HOPE-FLM: $4,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFamily Promise of Mid Michigan: $3,041 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMICHIGAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGenesee County Habitat for Humanity: $189 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAND OF HOPE-FLM ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise of Mid Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Eton Academy ↗
  • Who funds XCEPTIONAL HEROES ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds Genesee County Habitat for Humanity ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Serra FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Serra Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Flint · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jds Manna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jds Manna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jds Manna Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jds Manna Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jds Manna’s filings →

    More from the funding graph