Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James Samuel Rogers Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The James Samuel Rogers Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Orange County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The James Samuel Rogers Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $54k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
6
’18
3
’19
3
’20
2
’21
3
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$263kAnimals$88kPhilanthropy$55kCivil Rights$20kHealth$3kSocial Science$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL ON AGING-ORANGE COUNTY$25,000
BASSET HOUND RESCUE OF SO CALIF$15,000
FRIENDS OF LA ANIMAL SHELTER$6,000
Todd Anglin Home for Children$2,059
FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR SERVICES$2,000
Orange County Parks Foundation$1,500
American Political Science Associat$1,200
Region 9 Head Start Association$1,000
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $300 → 11%COUNCIL ON AGING-ORANGE COUNTY: $55k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 14%COUNCIL ON AGING-ORANGE COUNTY: $25k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING-ORANGE COUNTY: $25k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING-ORANGE COUNTY: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$363k · 11 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$363k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+335%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Human ServicesAnimalsSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +80%
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF AGING SO CAL
    3× · 2020–2023 · $115k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LA ANIMAL SHELTER
    5× · 2018–2023 · $42k

Funded once

  • GG
    GOLDEN GATE BASSET RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +335%
  • PT
    PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $800 · revenue +68%
  • CY
    CSP YOUTH SHELTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Scan Foundation

The scan foundation envisions a society where all of us can age well with purpose. we pursue this vision by igniting bold and equitable changes in how older adults age in both home and community.

Human Services
2
Ocean Genome Atlas Project

The Ocean Genome Atlas Project OGAP aims to collect, classify, sequence and map the genomic information of organisms representing at least 80 of the extant marine species worldwide. Deploying a fleet of advanced but cost effective research…

Science & Tech
3
Friends of Orange Countys Homeless Pets

Friends of Orange County's Homeless Pets (FOCHP) is a licensed 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our mission is to make homeless and unwanted pets more adoptable and provide them the opportunity to find lifelong families. This mission…

Animals
4
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
5
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
6
Orange County Justice Fund

To empower transformative change in the immigration system so the most vulnerable immigrants and refugees in Orange County, impacted by detention and deportation, are afforded legal representation, due process rights, and services for…

—
7
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
8
Onelegacy

Onelegacy saves and heals lives through organ, eye and tissue donation, comforts the families we serve, and inspires our communities to donate life.

Health
9
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
10
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
11
Institute On Aging

See schedule othe mission of the institute on aging is to enhance the quality of life for adults as they age by enabling them to maintain their health, well being, independence and participation in the community. ioa fulfills this mission…

Human Services
12
Orange County Technology Action Network

Octane connects people and ideas with capital and resources to fuel technology growth in orange county. our members represent orange county technology executive leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, venture capitalists, academicians, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Golden Gate Basset Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNCIL OF AGING SO CAL: $115,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF AGING SO CALFRIENDS OF LA ANIMAL SHELTER: $42,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LA ANIMAL SHELTERBASSET HOUND RESCUE OF SO CALIF: $30,000 · OtherBASSET HOUND RESCUE OF SO CALIFNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCEIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF OUTREACH: $12,200 · Other+12 more: $19,170 · Other+12 moreCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $120,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIF…TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $6,308 · Human Services+2 more: $2,300 · Human ServicesORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49,535 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNT…AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION: $2,300 · Social ScienceORANGE COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Community ImprovementGOLDEN GATE BASSET RESCUE: $1,000 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · Health
Other$251,370Human Services$128,608Philanthropy$49,535Social Science$2,300Community Improvement$1,500Animals$1,000Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $120,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49,535 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Senior Services Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetInternational Seafarers Center of LBLA: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetORANGE COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOLDEN GATE BASSET RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREGION IX HEAD START ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Seafarers Center of LBLA ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE BASSET RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds REGION IX HEAD START ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James Samuel Rogers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James Samuel Rogers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Samuel Rogers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph