Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$71kEducation$54kArts & Culture$44kRecreation & Sports$22kHuman Services$21kAnimals$10kYouth Development$8kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$900
Median grant
4
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JEROME'S PARISH$4,000
WAYLAND ACADEMY$3,640
BELMONT UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT$3,000
COLUMBIA COUNTY HUMAN SOCIETY$2,000
MADISON READING PROJECT$1,630
BEAVER DAM FLATTAIL$1,600
ST STEPHEN'S LUTHERN CHURCH$1,500
OPERA FOR THE YOUNG$1,500
FALL RIVER METHODIST CHURCH$1,500
LITERACY NETWORK$1,500
WISCONSIN VFW FOUNDATION$1,300
SUN PRAIRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,130
ONE TREE PLANTED$1,000
MADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
UW LA CROUSSE FOUNDATION INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $600 → 9%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $500 → 9%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $500 → 9%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $500 → 9%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $500 → 9%PAVE: $1k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $1k → 9%PAVE: $1k → 9%PAVE: $915 → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $600 → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $520 → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $500 → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $500 → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $500 → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $500 → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $500 → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $500 → 9%PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIORNMEN: $450 → 9%PAVE: $450 → 9%PAVE: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 36 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
13

Total granted

$229k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+166%

Still filing today

44%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WAYLAND ACADEMY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +28%
  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +108%
  • OF
    Opera for the Young Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • BD
    BEAVER DAM YOUTH BASKETBALL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SO
    Savanna Oaks Community Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +166%
  • DB
    DAYSTAR BAPTIST MISSIONS - PALAMA P
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
2
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
3
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
4
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment
5
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
6
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

—
7
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
8
Underdog Pet Rescue of Wisconsin Inc

Underdog pet rescue is an all-breed companion animal rescue and vet clinic based out of dane county, wisconsin. our mission is to find permanent homes for animals in need and to enrich lives by strengthening the connection between animals…

Animals
9
Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Visua

The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…

Health
10
Gathering Waters Inc

Gathering waters (wisconsin's alliance for land trusts) strengthens land trusts to protect wisconsin's special places and grow healthy, vibrant communities. the stronger the alliance between gathering waters' staff and board members, land…

Environment
11
Wisconsin Dental Association Inc

Advance the interests of wda members and the dental profession by promoting professional excellence and quality oral health care for the public.

Community Improvement
12
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Valley Enterprises Inc of Beaver Dam; the most unlike its peers is Hua Momona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JEROME'S PARISH: $36,875 · OtherST JEROME'S PARISHFALL RIVER METHODIST CHURCH: $11,500 · OtherFALL RIVER METHODIST CHURCHST STEPHEN'S LUTHERN CHURCH: $11,500 · OtherST STEPHEN'S LUTHERN CHURCHEIU PANTHERS CLUB: $8,500 · OtherMOUNT HOREB MUSIC BOOSTERS: $7,500 · OtherBEAVER DAM AREA ORCHESTRA INC: $7,200 · OtherBEAVER DAM COMMUNITY AREA THEATRE: $6,700 · OtherUS-LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $6,400 · OtherUW LA CROUSSE FOUNDATION INC: $6,160 · OtherBELMONT UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT: $5,500 · Other+30 more: $54,885 · Other+30 moreWAYLAND ACADEMY: $27,458 · EducationWAYLAND ACADEMYLITERACY NETWORK INC: $11,791 · EducationLITERACY NETWORK …Opera for the Young Inc: $11,291 · Arts & CultureSavanna Oaks Community Center Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureColumbus Area Historical Society: $750 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN: $4,440 · Human ServicesCLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $2,620 · Human ServicesBO WILLIAM HARTWIG FOUNDATION: $2,600 · Human ServicesYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $2,600 · Human ServicesJUSTDANE: $7,900 · ReligionCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $3,100 · ReligionCOLUMBIA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,660 · AnimalsMADISON CAT PROJECT INC: $1,360 · AnimalsMADISON READING PROJECT INC: $5,525 · Youth Development
Other$162,720Education$39,249Arts & Culture$17,541Human Services$12,260Religion$11,000Animals$8,020Youth Development$5,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYLAND ACADEMY: $27,458 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC: $11,791 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOpera for the Young Inc: $11,291 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetJUSTDANE: $7,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,660 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMADISON READING PROJECT INC: $5,525 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN: $4,440 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEROES HUNT FOR VETERANS CORP: $3,800 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $3,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $2,620 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBO WILLIAM HARTWIG FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES INC OF BEAVER DAM: $2,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $2,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $2,600 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN WOMEN'S NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMADISON CAT PROJECT INC: $1,360 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN VFW FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAYLAND ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Opera for the Young Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUSTDANE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MADISON READING PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN ↗
  • Who funds HEROES HUNT FOR VETERANS CORP ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Savanna Oaks Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
  • Who funds BO WILLIAM HARTWIG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES INC OF BEAVER DAM ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF DODGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN WOMEN'S NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MADISON CAT PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Peter J Seippel Foundation Inc · Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Dodge County Inc · Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn · Steve and Christa Slinger Family Gift Fund Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Lau & Bea Christensen Charitable Foundat · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack and Arlene Schumann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph