Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ivm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$17MScience & Tech$100kArts & Culture$31kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$6kHuman Services$6kAnimals$4kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK$10,000
KAATSBAAN$10,000
WINNAKEE LAND TRUST$10,000
THE GIRLS FOUNDATION OF TANZANIA$10,000
SCENIC HUDSON$10,000
ASTOR SERVICES - ADOPT-A-FAMILY$6,000
GAMBIARISING$6,000
PARTNERS FOR CLIMATE ACTION$5,000
DIRTY GAIA HV INC$5,000
THOMAS COLE HISTORIC NATIONAL SITE$5,000
RIVERKEEPER$5,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND$5,000
THIRTEEN WNET$4,000
MERCY SHIPS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 2% of grant dollars ($264k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 98% that went abroad ($17M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $5k → 11%GAMBIARISING: $6k → 10%WINNAKEE LAND TRUST: $25k → 9%RIVERKEEPER: $5k → 9%PS21: $5k → 11%PARTNERS FOR CLIMATE ACTION: $5k → 11%FOOD BANK OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $1k → 14%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $1k → 16%UNICEF: $1k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK: $10k → 20%MERCY SHIPS: $3k → 12%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3k → 9%STIFTUNG VAN MEETEREN: $17.2M → 16%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $100k → 11%CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $3k → 11%WINNAKEE LAND TRUST: $10k → 9%RIVERKEEPER: $5k → 9%PS21: $5k → 11%THOMAS COLE HISTORIC NATIONAL SITE: $5k → 11%FOOD BANK OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $1k → 14%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $1k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK: $10k → 20%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3k → 9%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $50k → 11%WINNAKEE LAND TRUST: $10k → 9%PS21: $3k → 11%THOMAS COLE HISTORIC NATIONAL SITE: $3k → 11%THIRTEEN WNET: $4k → 17%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $50k → 11%ASTOR SERVICES - ADOPT-A-FAMILY: $6k → 9%OLANA STATE HISTORICAL SITE: $3k → 11%THOMAS COLE HISTORIC NATIONAL SITE: $3k → 11%ASTOR SERVICES - ADOPT-A-FAMILY: $6k → 9%OLANA STATE HISTORICAL SITE: $3k → 11%RHINEBECK SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%OLANA STATE HISTORICAL SITE: $3k → 11%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 9%RHINEBECK SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%SCENIC HUDSON: $25k → 9%SCENIC HUDSON: $10k → 9%SCENIC HUDSON: $10k → 9%HUDSONIA LTD: $5k → 9%HUDSONIA LTD: $3k → 9%HUDSONIA LTD: $2k → 9%CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES: $2k → 9%DIRTY GAIA HV INC: $5k → 9%KAATSBAAN CULTURAL PARK: $10k → 9%KAATSBAAN: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 98% of all-years giving ($17M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$17M · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

2%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 26 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$438k
$17M

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +335%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +22%
  • P2
    PS 21 INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $17M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • ED
    ENVRIONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
7
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Glacier National Park Conservancy

The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.

Recreation & Sports
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winnakee Land Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ps 21 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $17,183,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+28 more: $320,500 · OtherWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson Inc: $45,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentCARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC: $4,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthPS 21 INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureGAMBIARISING: $6,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 · InternationalThe Girls Foundation of Tanzania: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$17,503,500Environment$105,000Health$29,000Arts & Culture$13,000International$11,000Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPS 21 INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDirty Gaia HV Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHINEBECK SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PS 21 INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Girls Foundation of Tanzania ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds GAMBIARISING ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Dirty Gaia HV Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds RHINEBECK SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FERNCLIFF FOREST INC ↗
  • Who funds MORTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ivm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ivm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ivm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph