· Private foundation
The Ingrid Mahan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $258k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREAT EXPECTATIONS | $61,000 |
| BELFAST SOUP KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SOMERSET ANIMAL RESCUE | $20,000 |
| THE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY | $18,200 |
| CENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE | $16,000 |
| PAN MASS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITAL | $15,000 |
| HEARTWORKS | $12,000 |
| PEN BAY WALDO HEALTH FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| K9S FOR WARRIORS | $10,000 |
| THE NATIONAL K12 CERAMIC EXHIBIT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST | $10,000 |
| HEAVEN ON EARTH FOR VETERANS | $10,000 |
| SEMPER FI FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $435k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEAVEN ON EARTH FOR VETERANS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +151%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC6× · 2018–2023 · $158k · revenue +46%
- CFCENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $141k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF SMERSET COUNTY RESCUE GROUPone grant, 2023 · $12k
- LLLIVE LIKE JONATHAN A NJ NON PROFIT CORPone grant, 2021 · $11k
- CFCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION NJone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization's mission is to improve the safety, quality, and affordability of healthcare for everyone.
The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…
Our purpose is to offer our skills and hearts to help patients and families live each day with hope and dignity.
To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.
The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Hope Hospice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Westbridge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEAVEN ON EARTH FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND SOMERSET INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds TRINITAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds Heartworks Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Belfast Soup Kitchen ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Westfield Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ingrid Mahan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safe & Sound Somerset Inc — 54% of income from government
- Autism New Jersey Inc — 44% of income from government
- Center for Hope Hospice Inc — 2% of income from government
- The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue — 0% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.