Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of The Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $32k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
11
’18
13
’19
13
’20
12
’21
12
’22
9
’23
4
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$897kHealth$67kArts & Culture$56kEducation$34kHuman Services$14kSocial Science$12kInternational$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER$3,000
BARUCH COLLEGE FUND$3,000
FRIENDS OF KAREN$2,500
DEVELOPMENT DEPT MIAMI CITY BALLET$2,000
WOMEN'S PROJECT THEATER$2,000
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI CENTER$2,000
FEEDING AMERICA$2,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$1,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,500
GLOBAL MEDICAL VOLUNTEERS$1,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC$1,000
ASPCA GIFT PROCESSING CENTER$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%JEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%JEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%JEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%GLAMOUR GALS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 33 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down. Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
1

Total granted

$232k
$1k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +19%
  • Cornell University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +59%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY JERSEY CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…

Health
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Liberty State Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $885,965 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTWOMEN'S PROJECT THEATER: $18,000 · OtherWOMEN'S PROJE…WOMEN'S PROJECT THEATRE: $12,500 · OtherWOMEN'S PROJE…MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $12,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOA…JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $11,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERA…DEVELOPMENT DEPT MIAMI CITY BALLET: $10,500 · OtherDEVELOPMENT D…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $9,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOA…ALVIN AILEY DANCE THEATRE: $9,000 · OtherALVIN AILEY D…HARVARD LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI CENTER: $7,500 · OtherHARVARD LAW S…WORLD OF SMILES FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherUNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $6,000 · Other+12 more: $30,000 · Other+12 moreTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $23,000 · EducationCornell University: $11,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $18,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · HealthGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesGLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING: $1,500 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $9,500 · Food & NutritionGlobal Medical Volunteers formerly Milphap 19: $9,500 · International
Philanthropy$885,965Other$132,000Education$34,000Health$28,500Human Services$19,000Food & Nutrition$9,500International$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $885,965 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Medical Volunteers formerly Milphap 19: $9,500 over 8y, 24% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Liberty State Park Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSONS UNITY WALK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Global Medical Volunteers formerly Milphap 19 ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLAMOURGALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Liberty State Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME ASSISTED LIVING ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSONS UNITY WALK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Inez Benjamin Foundation Stephen Rosenberg Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph