Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ima Hernandez Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$48kInternational$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kFood & Nutrition$14kAnimals$10kHuman Services$4kReligion$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$216k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION$8,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
BROWNSVILLE FARMERS MARKET$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TRINITY HORSE REFUGE$1,600
YUBA SUTTER FOOD BANK INC$1,000
DOBBINSOREGON HOUSE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Red Cross: $5k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 13%American Red Cross: $3k → 13%American Red Cross: $2k → 13%American Red Cross: $1k → 13%Yuba Feather Community Services: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 13 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$125k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
-34%

Still filing today

46%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +17%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +89%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2018–2024 · $16k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TC
    THE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc
—
2
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
4
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
5
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
6
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
7
Santa Clara River Conservancy

The Santa Clara River Conservancy represents the diverse interests of the Santa Clara River, from the flood plain to the highest tributaries, and seeks to secure, sustain, and manage significant lands and waters that provide habitat for…

Environment
8
Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc

CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.

Unclassified
9
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
11
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
12
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $46,291 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATIONBROWNSVILLE FARMERS MARKET: $6,000 · OtherBROWNSVILLE FARMERS MARKETIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY HORSE REFUGE: $5,288 · OtherTRINITY HORSE REFUGESecond Harvest Food Bank: $3,500 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankIndividual grant recipient: $3,440 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSanta Cruz County Animal Services: $3,100 · OtherSanta Cruz County Animal Se…Aptos High School: $1,300 · Other+7 more: $4,902 · Other+7 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $28,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…International Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Commi…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…YUBA FEATHER COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesYUBA FEATHER …Yuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc: $4,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Bridges: $3,500 · Food & NutritionBIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 · AnimalsKINDRED SPIRITS FAWN RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsNATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE: $100 · Animals
Education$46,291Other$33,530International$33,000Human Services$17,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Animals$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $46,291 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bridges: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYUBA FEATHER COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS FAWN RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Yuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Bridges ↗
  • Who funds BIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds YUBA FEATHER COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds KINDRED SPIRITS FAWN RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ima Hernandez Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ima Hernandez Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ima Hernandez’s filings →

    More from the funding graph