Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2020
19
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Food & Nutrition$138kEnvironment$115kEducation$49kYouth Development$36kCivil Rights$30kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$25kHealth$20kOther$0
02FY2020 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $140k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION$10,000
HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM$10,000
EQUITY TRUST$10,000
GATHER NEW HAVEN - PREV NEW HAVEN FARMS$10,000
CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST$10,000
GLYNWOOD$10,000
CARROT PROJECT$10,000
RACHEL'S NETWORKINC$10,000
GREEN WAVE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PERRENNIAL FARMING INITIATIVE$10,000
CITYSEED$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CARROT PROJECT: $10k → 8%SCHUMACHER CENTER: $5k → 12%NATURE BRIDGE: $5k → 10%GLYNWOOD: $10k → 6%SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%RACHEL'S NETWORKINC: $10k → 14%YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 9%WORKING LANDS ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%CONNECTICUT NOFA: $10k → 12%CARROT PROJECT: $10k → 8%SCHUMACHER CENTER: $5k → 12%NATURE BRIDGE: $5k → 10%GLYNWOOD: $5k → 6%YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 9%WORKING LANDS ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%CONNECTICUT NOFA: $5k → 12%CARROT PROJECT: $5k → 8%SCHUMACHER CENTER: $5k → 12%NATURE BRIDGE: $5k → 10%GLYNWOOD: $5k → 6%FRESH NEW LONDON: $10k → 9%CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST: $10k → 11%CONNECTICUT NOFA: $5k → 12%CARROT PROJECT: $5k → 8%SCHUMACHER CENTER: $5k → 12%NATURE BRIDGE: $5k → 10%GLYNWOOD: $5k → 6%FRESH NEW LONDON: $10k → 9%CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST: $5k → 11%GREEN WAVE: $10k → 12%PARTAKERS INC: $5k → 8%PERRENNIAL FARMING INITIATIVE: $10k → 10%FRESH NEW LONDON: $10k → 9%CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST: $5k → 11%GREEN WAVE: $10k → 12%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $10k → 9%GREEN WAVE: $10k → 12%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $6k → 9%HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM: $13k → 11%GREEN WAVE: $10k → 12%FRESH NEW LONDON: $6k → 9%HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM: $10k → 11%HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM: $10k → 11%CITISEED: $10k → 12%CITYSEED: $10k → 12%GATHER NEW HAVEN - PREV NEW HAVEN FARMS: $10k → 12%CITISEED: $10k → 12%CITISEED: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$418k · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$418k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+362%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Food & NutritionEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue ×16
  • CS
    CITY SEED INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +349%
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GN
    GATHER NEW HAVEN - PREV NEW HAVEN FARMS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • ZF
    ZERO FOODPRINTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +362%
  • SM
    SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +104%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
2
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

—
3
Sprout City Farms

Sprout city farms collaborates with communities to pursue food justice by cultivating innovative, restorative, and educational farms. sprout city farms envisions a thriving and equitable food system supported by a network of farms and…

Food & Nutrition
4
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
5
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

—
6
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
8
Organic Farm School

As a learning center, the organic farm school trains new farmers to develop and manage farms focused on ecological, economic and social regeneration - simultaneously offerring opportunities for our community and others to learn about their…

Education
9
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
10
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
11
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
12
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Third Sector New England Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partakers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHUMACHER CENTER: $20,000 · OtherSCHUMACHER CENTERNEW CT FARMER ALLIANCE: $10,000 · OtherNEW CT FARMER ALLIANCEGATHER NEW HAVEN - PREV NEW HAVEN FARMS: $10,000 · OtherGATHER NEW HAVEN - PREV NEW HAVE…WORKING LANDS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · OtherWORKING LANDS ALLIANCECOMMON GROUND: $10,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUNDRACHEL'S NETWORKINC: $10,000 · OtherRACHEL'S NETWORKINCARTS FOR LEARNING: $8,055 · OtherARTS FOR LEARNINGCITY SEED INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCITY SEED INCHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC: $32,500 · Food & NutritionHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INCConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionConnecticut Farmland Trust…ZERO FOODPRINT: $10,000 · Food & NutritionZERO FOODPRINTGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $40,000 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANIZ…CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $26,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLE…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSI…EQUITY TRUST INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureEQUITY TRUS…YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW FARM…THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementNATUREBRIDGE: $20,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitPARTAKERS INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$134,055Food & Nutrition$107,500Education$71,000Arts & Culture$45,000Community Improvement$30,000Environment$30,000Public Benefit$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $40,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCITY SEED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC: $32,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEQUITY TRUST INC: $25,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetPARTAKERS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetYELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZERO FOODPRINT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds CITY SEED INC ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTAKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds ZERO FOODPRINT ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation IncCT22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · The Robert Stern Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • City Seed Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Partakers Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yellow Farmhouse Education Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hunter Grubb’s filings →

More from the funding graph