· Private foundation
The Hung and Kv Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT VIETNAM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR VIETN | $10,000 |
| GLOBAL VILLAGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| REACHING OUT FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ICAN | $5,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM | $5,000 |
| NGOC TRONG TIM | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 12% of The Hung and Kv Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 82%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PVProject Vietnam Foundation8× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +53%
- MOMUSEUM OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM7× · 2018–2025 · $98k · revenue +97% · 94% of their budget
- OWOperation Walk Chicago2× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- AHAMERICAN HELPING ASIAN CHILDRENone grant, 2018 · $20k
- SASOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR VIETNone grant, 2024 · $18k
- AHAHMC HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +180%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide free medical care to poor people in Vietnam via annual medical missions.
To provide spiritual and financial support to the Saint Vincent DePaul Missionary Congregation in Vietnam in their mission and to help the sick, the poor, the orphan, the needy and the disadvantaged
Help minority of minority and ineeds people for education,relief, healthcare
To assist Vietnamese Franciscan Friars (OFM) in promoting the evangelization and charity mission of St Francis of Assisi in Vietnam.
Humanitarian aid for orphanages.
Help the poor in vietnam
Helping the wounded soldiers
To provide for the basic needs of shelter/housing, education and medicine.
To raise funds and assist the poor and needy in vietnam, especially those without financial means for medical cares.
Provide help such as food clothing medical care livestock equipment shelter school uniform and supply .... to the less fortunate in Vietnam.
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Project Vietnam Foundation ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM ↗
- Who funds AHMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Operation Walk Chicago ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR VIETNAM ↗
- Who funds LAVANG ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANNY PACQUIAO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Teresa Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds ANAHEIM POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VIET LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIETNAMESE HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 437 ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Hung and Kv Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hung and Kv Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Hung and Kv Family’s filings →