· Private foundation
The Hoyt Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY | $10,000 |
| CLUBHOUSE INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE | $5,000 |
| FOUNTAIN HOUSE | $3,000 |
| CHILDREN'S AID | $2,000 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR MENTAL HEALTH | $1,500 |
| BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +8%
- TNTHE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +182%
- EHENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST7× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +348%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $4k
- CACHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF NYone grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research and analysis in Behaviour Health with a mission to make sure that no person's life shall be limited by mental illness or addiction.
To improve the health and safety of adults and children by using objective, research-based information to encourage new, more effective programs & policies.
The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) is organized to reflect and advocate for the collective interest of state mental health authorities and their directors at the national level. NASMHPD analyzes…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
IASP is dedicated to preventing suicide and suicidal behaviour alleviating its effects and providing a forum for academics mental health professionals crisis workers volunteers and suicide survivors.
Supported education and research training for mental health.
We support current and emerging leaders with learned and lived experience to collectively advance behavioral health. To accomplish this, we convene and connect partners and thought leaders in critical conversations across sectors that:…
The corporation aims to enhance & expand the cooperative efforts of the sponsoring countries by establishing a central point for mental health & disability leaders in networking, educating mental health leaders, acting as a resource for…
The mission of mind share partners is to build awareness, support, and acceptance for people with mental health conditions.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds The Global Fund for Mental Health Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Hoyt Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hoyt Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hoyt Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Hoyt Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Hoyt’s filings →