Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hougen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$650kEducation$478kHuman Services$203kFood & Nutrition$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$25kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $148k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
FENTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$18,000
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$15,000
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$10,000
GENESYS HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
KETTERING UNIVERSITY$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
FLINT POLICE FUND$10,000
PEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT STUDY FOUNDATION$5,000
OPERATION ENDURING WARRIOR$5,000
HURON PINES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $7k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 16%WHALEY CHILDRENS CENTER: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
VA
AZ
NC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 32 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-40%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KU
    Kettering University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +42%
  • HF
    HURLEY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +74%
  • MF
    MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -43%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +64%
  • OA
    OFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Henry Ford Health Genesys Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

OMRF is dedicated to developing a better understanding of more effective treatments for human disease.

Health
8
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
9
Henry Ford Health Rochester Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
10
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
11
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
12
Henry Ford Health Macomb Oakland Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclaren Flint Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Robotics Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $151,000 · OtherEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYMCLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $136,300 · OtherMCLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERFENTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $76,500 · OtherFENTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLSSALVATION ARMY: $70,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFLINT POLICE FUND: $45,000 · OtherFLINT POLICE FUNDST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $38,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALHURON PINES: $28,500 · Other+11 more: $110,000 · Other+11 moreMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION: $89,500 · HealthMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATIONHENRY FORD HEALTH GENESYS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH GENESYS …PEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $44,000 · HealthPEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $30,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INCOPERATION ENDURING WARRIOR: $27,500 · HealthOPERATION ENDURING WARRIORGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN CLINICORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $18,500 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · Health+2 moreKettering University: $120,000 · EducationKettering Univ…FRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $53,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE…University of Chicago: $15,000 · EducationUniversity of …TARPON SPRINGS BAND BOOSTERS INC: $12,000 · EducationTARPON SPRINGS…OFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHURLEY FOUNDATION: $101,000 · Civil RightsWhaley Children's Center Inc: $54,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $83,000 · Food & NutritionCarriage Town Ministries: $37,500 · Arts & CultureSAM BEAUFORD WOODWORKING INST: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$655,300Health$372,500Education$208,000Civil Rights$101,000Human Services$99,000Food & Nutrition$83,000Arts & Culture$62,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKettering University: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHURLEY FOUNDATION: $101,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION: $89,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $83,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH GENESYS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetWhaley Children's Center Inc: $54,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $53,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetPEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCarriage Town Ministries: $37,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION ENDURING WARRIOR: $27,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetSAM BEAUFORD WOODWORKING INST: $25,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $18,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTARPON SPRINGS BAND BOOSTERS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOPD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPasco Sheriff's Charities Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetMichigan Robotics Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kettering University ↗
  • Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH GENESYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Whaley Children's Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PRESCOTT PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Carriage Town Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION ENDURING WARRIOR ↗
  • Who funds SAM BEAUFORD WOODWORKING INST ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds TARPON SPRINGS BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COPD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pasco Sheriff's Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds OFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Robotics Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater FlintMI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Flint · The Serra Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hougen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hougen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hougen’s filings →

More from the funding graph