Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hollis Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Hollis Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Hollis Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $325k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
19
6
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192021.

Philanthropy$598kFood & Nutrition$125kCivil Rights$100kHuman Services$56kHousing & Shelter$50kYouth Development$25kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS$100,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$100,000
THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN$25,010
AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
PHILANTROPITCH$25,000
THE STORE$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $25k → 14%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $25k → 10%THE STORE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
2
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Palm Beach County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

3
Digital Harbor Foundation

Democratizing societal and economic well-being through digital equity for everyone, increased diversity in the tech sector, innovative education, and technology for the public good

Education
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

6
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
7
Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc

Dedicated to alleviating hunger through acquisition and distribution of food and grocery products, community education to the causes and consequences of hunger, and meaningful action on behalf of people in need of food.

8
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
9
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

10
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
11
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
12
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $573,110 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $100,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Tex…NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsNAACP EMPOW…PHILANTHROPITCH — $25,000 · OtherPHILANTHRO…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF…AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 · OtherAUSTIN HAB…AUSTIN ANGELS — $10,000 · OtherAUSTIN ANG…PURE CHARITY HELP ONE NOW — $6,400 · OtherPURE CHARI…THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $25,010 · Human ServicesTHE STORE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $25,000 · Human ServicesSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $25,000 · HealthWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$573,110Food & Nutrition$100,000Civil Rights$100,000Other$91,400Human Services$75,010Health$25,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $573,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $25,010 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPHILANTHROPITCH — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STORE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hollis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph