Skip to content

· Private foundation

The High Pointe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$301k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$1.9MEducation$417kHousing & Shelter$392kFood & Nutrition$377kReligion$130kArts & Culture$107kEnvironment$40k
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $418k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $301k
$16,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$300,607
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DAF$245,935
FALMOUTH YMCA 5YR150 THRU '28$150,304
BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL$135,556
MASS GENERAL-MGH FUND$135,556
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL TRUST$135,556
FALMOUTH SERVICE CTR 2 YR PMNT$120,447
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$65,000
FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER$65,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$60,000
EMMAUS INC$40,000
TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME$30,000
PINE STREET INN$25,000
PROJECT BREAD$25,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $428k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EMMAUS INC: $40k → 10%EMMAUS INC: $30k → 10%EMMAUS INC: $23k → 10%EMMAUS INC: $20k → 10%EMMAUS INC: $20k → 10%EMMAUS INC: $13k → 10%TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME: $30k → 8%TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME: $30k → 8%TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME: $25k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $25k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $17k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $11k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $6k → 16%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $10k → 8%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $8k → 8%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $5k → 8%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $2k → 8%COMPASSIONATE CARE ALS: $2k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $25k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $20k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $12k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $10k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $10k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 44 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
3

Total granted

$5.5M
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+13%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $536k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $498k · revenue +76%
  • FS
    FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $291k · revenue +60%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $267k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $221k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $153k
  • EH
    EMMAUS HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $102k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
2
Emerson Health System Inc

Emerson health systems is the parent organization of four subsidiaries - emerson hospital, emerson occupational health services, emerson property development and emerson health care foundation. emerson health systems provides its…

Health
3
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
4
Care Dimensions Inc

Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.

—
5
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
8
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
9
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
10
Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc

MHQP's mission is to improve the quality and equity of patient care experiences in Massachusetts through data-driven insights and collaboration. As an independent voice for healthcare quality and an advocate for the importance of listening…

Education
11
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
12
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Massachusetts and Rhode Island Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING AC: $660,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACMASS GENERAL-MGH FUND: $642,960 · OtherMASS GENERAL-MGH FUNDMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $642,960 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $450,607 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $291,126 · OtherFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INCFIDELITY CHARITABLE DAF: $245,935 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DAFLASALLE ACADEMY: $164,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $152,803 · Other+28 more: $1,308,710 · Other+28 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $497,960 · HealthChildren's Hospita…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $267,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDA…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $220,938 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME PARENT INC: $47,000 · HealthDUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC: $43,500 · Health+1 more: $16,500 · HealthEMMAUS INC: $146,000 · Human ServicesTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $82,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $72,000 · Human ServicesCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $43,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $217,000 · EducationPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $86,000 · Food & NutritionROSIE'S PLACE INC: $82,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $52,500 · PhilanthropyJENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION: $22,300 · Philanthropy
Other$4,559,101Health$1,092,898Human Services$428,000Education$217,000Food & Nutrition$86,000Housing & Shelter$82,000Philanthropy$74,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $497,960 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $291,126 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $267,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $220,938 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $217,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetEMMAUS INC: $146,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $86,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $82,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $82,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $72,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $52,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CAPE COD INC: $48,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME PARENT INC: $47,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $43,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $33,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION: $22,300 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SAMARITANS ON CAPE COD: $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CAPE COD INC ↗
  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME PARENT INC ↗
  • Who funds DUFFY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Stanley W Watson Foundation · Cape Cod Healthcare Inc & Affiliates · Lyndon Paul Lorusso Charitable Foundatio · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The High Pointe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The High Pointe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Samaritans On Cape Cod: 82% of income from government
  • Duffy Health Center Inc: 51% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Emmaus Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Tufts Medicine Care at Home Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The High Pointe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The High Pointe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on High Pointe’s filings →

More from the funding graph