Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Henry Vincent Couper Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$58kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$22kEducation$22kFood & Nutrition$15kInternational$15kScience & Tech$11kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLETON COUNCIL OF AGING$8,000
LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY$2,500
LITTLETON ROAD RACE TRACK ORGANIZATION$1,000
LITTLETON ROTARY CLUB OF MA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THINK OUTSIDE THE VOX$1,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$1,000
OPEN DOOR THEATRE$500
TOWN OF SHIRLEY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES: $3k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC: $500 → 16%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 11%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 11%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 11%CATIES CLOSET: $350 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 21 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$163k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+3%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OPEN DOOR THEATRE OF ACTON INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +931%
  • LS
    Littleton Scholarship Trust
    4× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF REUBEN HOAR LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • LA
    LITTLETON ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ASSOCIA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
2
Little League of Manomet Inc Nka Plymouth Little League Inc

Provide instruction and opportunity for children to participate in sports in order to promote a sense of fair play and healthy competition.

—
3
Littleton Community Center

The Littleton Community Center (LCC) is the living historical and social centerpiece of Littleton. A historic property available to the public for meetings, community events, and social gatherings.

Human Services
4
Little Compton Community Center Corporation

Provide educational, social, and cultural programming for the enrichment of the community of Little Compton, Rhode Island.

Recreation & Sports
5
Lowell Farm and Wildlife Center
Animals
6
Holliston Historical Society
—
7
Cohasset 250

250th Town of Cohasset, MA celebrations

—
8
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
9
Westwood Land Trust Inc

To promote the protection and stewardship of open space and natural resources in the Town of Westwood.

Environment
10
Hadley Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical memorabilia - town of Hadley MA

—
11
North Shore Children's Theatre Inc

The North Shore Children's Theater provides an inclusive and affordable theater arts education to children in the North Shore of Massachusetts and surrounding areas.

Arts & Culture
12
Little Compton Food Bank

Provide nourishing food and basic necessities to the residents of Little Compton and Tiverton Rhode Island.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Wonderfund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Open Door Theatre of Acton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLETON COUNCIL ON AGING: $55,500 · OtherLITTLETON COUNCIL ON AGINGLITTLETON COUNCIL OF AGING: $15,000 · OtherLITTLETON COUNCIL OF AGINGIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $10,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAULROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $9,950 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALFRIENDS OF REUBEN HOAR LIBRARY: $8,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF REUBEN HOAR LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient: $5,550 · OtherLOAVES FISHES: $5,000 · Other+20 more: $24,835 · Other+20 moreOPEN DOOR THEATRE OF ACTON INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureOPEN DOOR…THINK OUTSIDE THE VOX: $1,750 · Arts & CultureTHINK OUT…Littleton Historical Society: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLittleton…Littleton Scholarship Trust: $10,000 · EducationHORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC: $500 · Human ServicesCatie's Closet Inc: $350 · Human ServicesLITTLETON TRACK ORGANIZATION: $1,750 · Recreation & SportsTHE ROUDENBUSH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $2,200 · Housing & ShelterSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$144,335Arts & Culture$15,250Education$10,000Human Services$8,850Recreation & Sports$2,750Housing & Shelter$2,200Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN DOOR THEATRE OF ACTON INC: $12,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetLittleton Scholarship Trust: $10,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $9,950 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetHORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNASHOBA VALLEY CHORALE INC THE: $3,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLITTLETON COMMUNITY FARM: $2,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLETON TRACK ORGANIZATION: $1,750 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTHINK OUTSIDE THE VOX: $1,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ROUDENBUSH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLittleton Historical Society: $1,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittleton Tigers Youth Football & Cheer: $750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatie's Closet Inc: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN DOOR THEATRE OF ACTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Littleton Scholarship Trust ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHOBA VALLEY CHORALE INC THE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLETON COMMUNITY FARM ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLETON TRACK ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds THINK OUTSIDE THE VOX ↗
  • Who funds THE ROUDENBUSH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Littleton Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds LITTLETON CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC ↗
  • Who funds Littleton Tigers Youth Football & Cheer ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Catie's Closet Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOLI ATAMIAN CAMPERSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Henry Vincent Couper Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Henry Vincent Couper Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Nashoba Valley Chorale Inc the: 11% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Open Door Theatre of Acton Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Catie's Closet Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Think Outside the Vox: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Henry Vincent Couper Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Henry Vincent Couper Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry Vincent Couper’s filings →

More from the funding graph